Simple work and variable position question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by a variable force on a particle with a given position function. The user attempts to derive the work using the formula W=F*s and integrates the position function to find the work over the time interval of 1.49 seconds. They express concern about the accuracy of their solution, particularly regarding the assumption of gravitational force. Another participant suggests finding the force from the second derivative of the position function instead of relying on gravity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the problem's conditions to arrive at the right answer.
iJamJL
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A one-dimensional force acts on a particle of mass m = 6.26 kg in such a way that its position is given by:

x = 0.484t^3 - 33.6t

Find W, the work done by this force during the first 1.49 s.


Homework Equations


W=F*s
W=mgs
Integration


The Attempt at a Solution


I just wanted to know whether I'm solving this correctly because I only have one more chance to input an answer in my online homework system (as those of you who have been helping me probably know by now. :frown:

Anyhow, this is what I've done.

W=Fs
F=mg
W=mgs
**Because the position is variable but the mass and gravity are constant, we integrate the formula given, and we get:

W=mg*∫x.dx= (.121t^4) - 16.8(t^2), from 0s to 1.49s

We come to:

W=mg*(-36.7)
W=6.26*9.81*(-36.7)= (-2253.8) J

Did I do this properly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem does not say that the particle is subjected to gravity. F=ma, and the acceleration is second derivative of position. Find the force from the given x(t) function.

ehild
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top