Why is the Sun Expanding Beyond Earth in Seconds?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Sun's expansion during its transition to the red giant phase and the confusion surrounding the timing of this process. It is clarified that while the Sun will undergo fusion until it reaches iron, the expansion to a red giant does not occur in mere seconds; rather, it takes a significant amount of time. The expansion happens as the Sun exhausts its hydrogen and begins fusing helium in a shell around its core, leading to a gradual increase in size and a cooling effect. The misconception that the Sun could expand rapidly is addressed, emphasizing that gravity and light speed constraints mean any changes would be felt on Earth after an 8-minute delay. Ultimately, the red giant phase will likely envelop the inner planets, though the timeline for this transformation is much longer than initially suggested.
oilfan04
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Alright. Now, I understand that the Sun is 1/2 way through its complete H-He fusion cycle, and I realize that after this fusion cycle, it will pass through all the elements until Fe, (i don't know whether it passes through each element in 7 seconds, or it takes 7 seconds for each element). My question is, if the atoms are getting larger as you go farther down the table, and the Sun would theoretically expand (possibly) to Jupiter's position in that short time, and considering that matter cannot travel faster than the speed of light, how does this work?

I know, I shouldn't think in classical physics terms, but I can't seem to find an answer. The reason being, is that it takes 8 minutes for light to reach Earth from the Sun, however, the Sun would be expanding far beyond Earth in a matter of seconds. Why?

P.S. my Physics teacher had told me how far the Sun would expand to, so I'm using his information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you explain to me why you think that the sun would expand this far in a matter of seconds? I always thought that the expansion to red giant stage would take place more gradually. Also, I remember reading that a star like the sun would expand enough to envelop the inner planets, but not the outer ones, contrary to what your teacher said. Anyone?
 
Well, I understand that the Sun will undergo fusion reactions until its Fe state, then fission occurs.

Again, time and sizes have been from my teacher's mouth, not mine. But the question is, if matter cannot exceed the speed of light, and it takes 8 minutes for light to reach the earth, then why is it taking only a matter of seconds for the Sun to pass through all the fusion reactions and expand to envelop the inner planets? Thinking classically, it's not possible. However, on another level of physics it is, and I'm asking why.

Sorry if I'm going around in circles on this one.
 
I not one to contradict your teacher, but what he's saying just isn't making sense to me. Nothing with mass, can travel at or faster than the speed of light. Gravity travels at light speed, so should anything happen to the sun, on Earth we would feel it 8 mins later, and so on and so forth.
Our sun will most problably go through as cepheid said, a red giant phase. In a red giant phase, as a star has used up it's outer H-He, it they begins to fuel itself with H from a relatively small shell around it's core. Because fusion is occurring so close to the core (creating heavier elements, like you said stoping at iron) the star's outer levels begins to expand. To expand it uses up energy (beating the sun's gravity), so the star is cooled and redshifted.
The star becomes larger and larger, cooler and cooler, giving it the name red giant. It will most probably envelop the inner planets (mars might get excluded), though due the gravitational concequences of the red giant phase, the inner planets might be lost in space. This procces does not happen in seconds or minutes, it takes quite an amount of time, but I don't know exactly.

1 extra thing, remember though the atoms are getting heavier, there are less and less of them, for 1: because they are being fused, and 2: the star is running out of them.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top