How Does Changing the Angle of a Third Polarizer Affect Light Intensity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ObviousManiac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polarization
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the intensity of light passing through three Polaroid filters, specifically focusing on the effect of the angle of the third polarizer. The initial intensity at point B is calculated as 0.375 Io after the first two filters. The challenge arises in determining the intensity at point C with the third filter at 50 degrees, leading to confusion over the correct application of the intensity equations. The key point is recognizing that the light exiting the second polarizer is already polarized at 30 degrees, which affects the calculation for the third polarizer. Ultimately, the correct intensity at point C is stated to be 0.331 Io, highlighting the importance of considering the polarization angle when applying the formulas.
ObviousManiac
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A helium-neon laser emits a beam of unpolarized light thatpasses through three Polaroid filters, as shown in the figure . The intensity of the laser beam is I_{o}.
Walker.25.72.jpg


Suppose the third filter were at an angle of 50˚, what would be the intensity at point C?

Homework Equations


I = Io cos^2(x)

I = Io/2 (Unpolarized light through transmission axis)

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried a bunch of things...

First I calculated the intensity at point B, which I found to be .375 Io via (1/2)Io*cos^2(30˚)

Then I tried .375Io*cos^2(50˚)

and also tried replacing .375 with .375/2 and just 1/2

But I can't get my teacher's answer, which is .331 Io
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ObviousManiac said:
First I calculated the intensity at point B, which I found to be .375 Io via (1/2)Io*cos^2(30˚)
So far so good! :approve:
Then I tried .375Io*cos^2(50˚)
But the light just passed through polarizer 2 which was configured at 30o. That means not only the light is already polarized, but the light already has a polarization angle of 30o before it even gets to polarizer 3 (the one configured at 50o).

So what's the angular difference between polarizer 3's angle and the polarization angle of the light at B?
and also tried replacing .375 with .375/2 and just 1/2
Now you're just randomly guessing.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top