What does the lost information in the wavefunction mean?

Runner 1
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
The wavefunction is defined on the domain of complex numbers. To find the probability of discovering a particle in a certain region, the amplitude of the wavefunction is integrated over that region. The problem is that you have an infinite set of complex numbers mapping to a single amplitude. What does the information that is lost when the wavefunction is "squared" represent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A complex number z can be represented by two real numbers: the absolute value |z| and the phase of z. The probability density is equivalent to the absolute value of complex wave function and does not depend on the phase. If I understood your question correctly, you ask what the phase of complex wave function corresponds to, what is the physical meaning of it?

The answer is that the phase plays a role in calculating probability densities of other observables (not positions), such as momentum or various complicated functions of both position and momentum.

An alternative answer is that, according to the Bohmian interpretation, the phase determines a deterministic (not merely probabilistic) physical property - the velocity of the particle at a given position.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
128
Views
13K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
15K
Back
Top