Large Aircraft Take-Off: How Much Space is Needed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EngTechno
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aircraft Space
AI Thread Summary
Larger aircraft generally require longer runways for takeoff compared to smaller aircraft due to their increased weight and the need for higher speeds to achieve lift. The takeoff distance is influenced by factors such as engine power and aerodynamic design. Additionally, larger planes take longer to decelerate upon landing, necessitating more runway space. While this is a general rule, specific aircraft characteristics and technologies can create exceptions. Overall, the size and weight of an aircraft significantly impact its runway requirements.
EngTechno
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Does Larger aircraft need longer way (space) than smaller aircraft to take off?And why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a general sense, yes. The larger/heavier the aircraft, the faster it will need to be traveling relative to the wind to take off, and the longer it takes to decelerate when landing. Of course, this also depends on the available power for take off and the presence of things like thrust reversers for landing, the particular aircraft has. This is that kind of question that has a general answer but there will always be exceptions.
 

Thread 'Radiation Hard Electronic Design for LVO Long Mission'

Venus does not have a magnetosphere, so the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment shall be much worse than in a LEO environment. Looking to the std radiation models for Venus, the standard radiation-hard space level electronic component with tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg seems not enough, so, for example, a 1cm2 Si die will suffer considerable flux above this level during a long mission (10 years for example). So, the question is, usually we are not paying attention to latch-up...
View full post »

Thread 'Space Stuff and Launch Info'

Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
View full post »
Thread 'SpaceX Starship development: 7th flight January 10'

Thread 'SpaceX Starship development: 7th flight January 10'

Watch the progress live This is a fully stacked Starship (top) and Super Heavy (bottom). A couple of too-small-to-see cars near the bottom for scale, I also added a Saturn V and the Statue of Liberty for comparison. 120 meters tall, about 5000 tonnes when fully fueled. Twice the mass and over twice the thrust of Saturn V. The largest rocket ever built by mass, thrust, height, and payload capacity. N1 had the largest diameter.[/size] But its size is not the revolutionary part. It is designed...
View full post »

Similar threads

Groundbreaking ‘blended-wing’ demonstrator plane cleared to fly
Replies
12
Views
3K
Could a blimp shrink into a plane?
Replies
6
Views
2K
The Future of Rocket Propulsion, What To Do About Emissions
Replies
4
Views
3K
Power required to compress air in a gas turbine
Replies
23
Views
6K
Calculating suction area around the intake of a jet engine
Replies
3
Views
5K
Can dimpled fuselages reduce drag on aircraft?
Replies
7
Views
7K
Misc. Designing a Model Aircraft: Calculating Thrust and Lift for an Efficient Flight
Replies
9
Views
3K
Vertical Take Off: Adopting VTO & Vertical Landing in Commercial Aircraft
Replies
15
Views
2K
Determining the acceleration of an aircraft
Replies
46
Views
15K
SpaceX Starship (/Super Heavy) testing: Mk1 stacked, 20 km flight this year
Replies
30
Views
9K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top