Thrust force of a rocket ejecting mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the thrust force of a rocket using the conservation of mass and momentum principles. It establishes that the thrust force, represented as F = -v_e (dm/dt), arises from the momentum change of the rocket-exhaust system. The conversation highlights the importance of analyzing the system from an inertial frame co-moving with the rocket to clarify the relationship between force and momentum. It emphasizes that while momentum is not conserved for the rocket alone, it is conserved when considering the rocket and the ejected mass together. The participants conclude that understanding the impulse experienced by the ejected mass leads to the correct formulation of the thrust force.
Emspak
Messages
240
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



OK, this seems simple but I want to make sure I am not doing something totally wrong. The problem says: use the conservation of mass of a system of many particles to shoe that the thrust force of a rocket that ejects mass at rate \frac{dm}{dt} is equal to F=-v_e \frac{dm}{dt} where v_e is the velocity of the mass ejected.


The Attempt at a Solution



I looked at it this way: momentum is conserved so if we start with mass m of the rocket, mv = k (where k is a constant).

SInce we have a simple differential equation F=-v_e \frac{dm}{dt} it can be integrated as -m v_e = Ft. Taking the derivative w/r/t time we get -m \frac {d v_e}{dt} = F

That gets us the F=ma part of the equation, showing that that works. But I notice that if momentum is a k (constant) then -m v_e = k = Ft.

There's a step I am missing here I think. I feel like I am almost there. Any hep -- and anyone telling me I have approached this in entirely the wrong way -- would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The momentum of the rocket is *not* a conserved quantity. What you are missing is that to look at things from the perspective of conservation of momentum you need to look at the rocket+exhaust cloud system.

Another issue is how you look at force. There is a direct connection with the conservation laws if you use ##\vec F=d(m\vec v)/dt##. However, this means force is a frame-dependent quantity if mass is not constant. Force becomes frame invariant if you use ##\vec F = m\vec a##, but now the immediate connection with the conservation laws is lost.

It might help if you look at things from the perspective of an inertial frame that is co-moving with the rocket (i.e., an inertial frame in which the rocket's instantaneous velocity is zero). The F=dp/dt versus F=ma imbroglio vanishes with this choice.
 
A very simple version, alon DH's reasoning, is the following:

Let us move along with the rocket through a tiny time Dt, in which a little mass Dm has been ejected with a velocity, relative to the rocket, v_e.

That little packet of mass has expreniced a momentum change, what we call an impulse, of Dmv_e

Impulse equals Dt*F, so the little packet of mass experienced the force:

F=v_e*Dm/Dt.

Now, by Newton's 3 law, you'll get the result for the thrust force for the rocket!
---
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks to you both. I felt like this was a much simpler problem than it looked...
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top