Why are more stable carbocations faster formed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sludger13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stable
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between activation energy and the thermodynamic stability of carbocations in chemical reactions. It emphasizes that activation energy is influenced not only by the structure of the reactants but also by the stability of the carbocation formed during the reaction. A more stable carbocation can lead to a higher reaction enthalpy, potentially increasing the kinetic energy of the remaining reagents and accelerating the reaction. The conversation also highlights that activation energy represents the energy difference between reactants and the transition state, which often resembles the carbocation. Additionally, the extent of a reaction is determined by both forward and reverse reactions, with steric hindrance affecting the reversibility of carbocations based on their degree of substitution. Overall, the stabilization of carbocations plays a crucial role in the activation energy and the reaction dynamics.
sludger13
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I have no idea how activation energy of a chemical reaction (in either direction) could depend on the thermodynamic stability of formed carbocation, as a product of that reaction. Activation energy of a chemical reaction should depend only on the structure of reagents, right?

The only thing I'm considering is that the more stable is a carbocation, the greater is the reaction enthalpy, thus it could (maybe) better heat the remaining reagents. And with greater Ek of that particles, then the reaction really run faster.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Or, the structure of (1°, 2°, 3°) carbon substitueted REAGENTS really prevent
from elimination of carbocation differently...
 
Activation energy isn't the only factor. The extent to which a reaction occurs is the sum total of the forward and reverse reactions, which happen continuously. Most everything can and does reverse spontaneously to a certain extent, which is dependent on the stability of the reactants and the products.

In the case of carbocations, the molecule separates into its constituent ions. With enough activation energy, they can reverse and reform the full compound. Repeat ad nauseum. Steric hindrance makes the reversal of 3° more difficult than the reversal of 2° and 1°, but it still happens to a certain extent. These relative amounts of hindrance, and therefore the rate of the reverse reaction, are what determine the overall forward rate.

That's how I came to understand it in my organic classes, which were close to 4 years ago now, so somebody else may be able to explain it better or point out if I happened to get something wrong.
 
Activation energy is the difference in energy between the reactands and the transition state. The factors stabilizing the Carbocation are also important in the stabilization of the transition state which resembles more the carbocation than the neutral reactands.
 
DrDu said:
Activation energy is the difference in energy between the reactands and the transition state. The factors stabilizing the Carbocation are also important in the stabilization of the transition state which resembles more the carbocation than the neutral reactands.
This explanation seems fair to me, thanks.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top