How Do You Apply Undetermined Coefficients to Solve Differential Equations?

AI Thread Summary
To solve the differential equation y'' + 2y' - 3y = 8e^x - 12e^(3x) using the method of undetermined coefficients, the homogeneous solution is correctly identified as yh = c1e^x + c2e^(-3x). The particular solution should be proposed as y_p = Axe^x + Be^(3x) due to the presence of e^x and e^(3x) on the right-hand side. The discussion emphasizes the importance of differentiating between homogeneous and particular solutions, confirming that the proposed form for y_p is appropriate. Additionally, Lagrange's method of variation of parameters is mentioned as an alternative approach for finding particular solutions. The overall conclusion is that the method of undetermined coefficients can effectively yield the particular solution when applied correctly.
EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I have this DE:

y'' + 2y' - 3y = 8ex - 12e3x

when I find homogeneous solution I get

yh = c1ex + c2e-3x;

so now to find the particular solution by method of undetermined coefficients, do I set y to smth like this:

y = y1 + y2

where
y1 = Axex,
y2 = A3x ?

since one of the solutions to auxiliary equation appears on the RHS of the DE and the other does not?
I don't need the full solution, just confirmation/correction of this part.

Thanks much!

EDIT: if I take the fact that if y1 + y2 is a solution, then y1 is a solution and y2 is a solution. I guess I answered my own question. :frown:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well EvLer, it's nice if you first recognize that the RHS is a particular solution to a homogeneous equation with roots 1, 3 so that equation would be:

(D-1)(D-3)y=0

You familiar with those differential operations right?

Thus, applying that operator to both sides of your equation will make the RHS 0 right (it's a solution to that homogeneous operator which is set to zero). So applying it we get:

(D-1)(D-3)(D^2+2D-3)y=0

Are you following this?

So the solution to this is:

y_c(x)=C_1e^x+Axe^x+C_3e^{-3x}+Be^{3x}

Now, take:

y_p(x)=Axe^x+Be^{3x} and back-substitute into your original equation, equate coefficients to find A and B.
 
Why don't you apply Lagrange's method of variation of constants...?

Daniel.
 
Yeah, thanks, I got it 5 minutes after posting.

@saltydog: it's the same technique, only we follow it more step-by-step, where we solve homogeneous equation first and then based on the solution of non-hom. and hom. eq. we pick appropriate form of particular solution, and then do differentiation and plug it all in.

ARRRGGGH @ DE!

ps: don't know what "Lagrange's method of variation of constants" is but thanks, i'll look that up.
 
Lagrange's method of variation of constants is also known as variation of parameters. It is based on the fact that if y_1 and y_2 are solutions to an homogeneous ODE, then so is c_1 y_1 and c_2 y_2 by principle of superposition. But we aim to find the particular solution of the form u(t) y_1(t) and v(t) y_2(t)

The bottom line is that the particular solution is

Y_p(t) = -y_1(t) \int \frac {y_2(t) g(t)}{W(y_1, y_2) (t)} dt ~+~ y_2(t) \int \frac {y_1(t) g(t)}{W(y_1, y_2)(t)}dt
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top