Heat and Mass Proportionality: Examining the Accuracy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the mass of a liquid and the time required to convert it to gas under constant heat supply. It asserts that the time is directly proportional to the mass, given that the heat supplied remains constant. The equation presented, t = m^2(l + cθ), raises questions about the meaning of the variables involved, specifically m (mass), c (specific heat capacity), θ (temperature change), and l (latent heat of vaporization). Clarification is sought on how these variables interact and their implications for the boiling process. Overall, the accuracy of the proportionality and the equation's structure is under scrutiny.
latyph
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I NOTICED THAT THE TIME REQUIRED FOR A GIVEN MASS OF A LIQUID IS PROPORTIONAL DIRECTLY TO THE MASS OF THE LIQUID PROVIDED THE HEAT SUPPLY IS CONSTANT,WHICH MAKES t PROPORTIONAL TO m,the heat is constant.now heat is mctheta +ml.which makes t =m^2(l+ctheta).how true is this,is there a fault i this let me know
 
Physics news on Phys.org
given mass of liquid to change to gas to be precised,i made a mistake typin
 
Okay, every liquid has a "heat of boiling" that is the amount of heat required to change 1 gram of the liquid, already at the boiling point into gas. In order to boil x grams of liquid, you must supply a specific number of calories of heat. If you are providing the heat at a constant rate, then the time required to convert all of the liquid to gas is proportional to the mass.

However, having said "THE HEAT SUPPLY IS CONSTANT", you then say "now heat is mctheta +ml". I don't understand that. What are the variables? m, c, theta, l?
or is that ctheta[/b]? I would guess that m is the mass, but what are c and theta (or ctheta[/b]) and is l a separate constant or is ml one amount? Please tell us what your symbols mean.
 
m mass of liquid,c specific heat capacity,theta change in temp.l latent heat of vaporization
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top