Is Conservation of Momentum Essential for Understanding Particle Interactions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter matpo39
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
Conservation of momentum is critical for understanding particle interactions, particularly in scenarios involving photons and electrons. When a photon with momentum p_γ is deflected by a free electron, the momentum components must be analyzed in both the x and y directions. The momentum of the electron after the interaction can be expressed as p_e = p_γ' in the -y direction, with the x component calculated using p_ex = √(p_γ² - p_γ'² - p_ey²). This approach emphasizes that the total momentum before the interaction equals the total momentum after the interaction. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately analyzing particle interactions.
matpo39
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
if you have a photon with momentum p_\gamma traveling in the +x direction which is then deflected off a free electron and now the photon has momentum p_\gamma' and isin the +y direction.
so the components of momentum for the electron would be
p_e = p_\gamma' in the -y direction and for the x component

p_ex= \sqrt{p_\gamma^2-p_\gamma'^2-p_ey^2}

does this seem like the correct approach to this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What was the question?
Could this be the answer? That is the components of the momentum of the system before the interaction should be equal to the components of the momentum of the system after the interaction.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top