Is it Logical to Have Both dp/dq and dq/dp in the Same Formula?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of including both dp/dq and dq/dp in the same formula, with one participant expressing skepticism about its logic. They argue that having both expressions implies a simultaneous dependency of p on q and q on p, which seems contradictory. Another participant suggests that if p is a function of q, the inverse function theorem allows for a local definition of a function that could justify the use of both derivatives. They plan to share a relevant paper to provide context for their argument. The conversation highlights the complexities and nuances of differential notation in mathematics.
Castilla
Messages
241
Reaction score
0
A question: is it possible (maybe handling differentials, I don't know) to have in the same formula these two expressions: \frac{dp}{dq} and
\frac{dq}{dp}?

I think it is illogical. It would imply that at same time p is a function of q and q is a function of p. That seems nonsense to me. Am I allright?

Thanks for any answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't differential notation great? :rolleyes:

There are several routes to happiness, but they all will give the same answer in the end (which is the reason such notation continues to be popular -- brevity is surprisingly important in mathematical notation).


One route to happiness is to have p be a function of q, and if the conditions of the inverse function theorem are satisfied, we can (locally) define a function \hat{q} with the property that \hat{q}(p(q)) = q, and then we can say that dq/dp really "means" d\hat{q}/dp.
 
I have not here the paper where I found the formula that contained both
derivatives, but tomorrow I will get it and I will post it here with all its context. Then I will ask you, Hurkyl, if said formula is aceptable on grounds of the explanation that you kindly have posted. (Excuse my english).
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
I was thinking using 2 purple mattress samples, and taping them together, I do want other ideas though, the main guidelines are; Must have a volume LESS than 1600 cubic centimeters, and CAN'T exceed 25 cm in ANY direction. Must be LESS than 1 kg. NO parachutes. NO glue or Tape can touch the egg. MUST be able to take egg out in less than 1 minute. Grade A large eggs will be used.
Back
Top