Solve RLC Series Circuit: Find Vrms, Power Factor & Draw Phasor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving an RLC series circuit problem involving a peak voltage of 141.4 volts and a frequency of 1 kHz. The participant initially struggled to determine the RMS voltage across the resistor, the power factor, and to draw the phasor diagram. They correctly identified that in a series circuit, the current is the same through all components, allowing the use of a phasor diagram for calculations. The final conclusion was that the RMS voltage over the resistor is 100 volts, resulting in a power factor of 1, indicating a purely resistive circuit. Overall, the participant gained clarity on their approach, although it came too late for their exam.
discoverer02
Messages
138
Reaction score
1
I just finished an exam and this problem gave me fits. It seemed simple enough when I first looked at it, but it took me a while to come to the following conclusions which I'm not sure are correct.

The problem had an RLC series circuit with source of 141.4 Volts peak and a frequence of 1 kHz. The RMS voltage over the inductor is 100 volts and the RMS voltage over the capacitor is 40 volts.

I needed to find the RMS voltage over the resistor, the power factor and draw a phasor diagram of the voltages.

This is my reasoning and boy do I hope it's correct:

Since it's a series circuit the current is the same through all the components. Therefore, can't I use a phasor diagram to find Vrms over the resistor.

The voltage of the inductor would have a phase angle of 90 degrees and the voltage of the capacitor would have a phase angle of -90 degrees, so on the y-axis (complex axis) I'd have a vector 60 volts long and on the x-axis (real axis) I'd have the 100 rms volts from the source or would I have the unknown Vrms of the resistor?

Argh! I put the 100 volts rms for the source on the x-axis, but now I'm thinking it should have been the unknown Vrms over the resistor.

Too tired to think about out it right now, but I'd really appreciate some input.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yup, after considerable thought. The voltage for the resistor should have been on the x-axis, not the voltage for the source. I guess I was confused by the fact that you usually use the source voltage with a phase angle of 0 as your reference point.

Anyway it all comes back to me now. (too little too late for my exam).

Thanks anyway.
 


Hi there,

First off, congratulations on finishing your exam! It's always tough to work through difficult problems, but it sounds like you put a lot of thought into this one.

From your description, it seems like you were on the right track with your reasoning. In a series circuit, the current is the same through all components, so you can use a phasor diagram to find the RMS voltage over the resistor. The voltage of the inductor will have a phase angle of 90 degrees (since it leads the current) and the voltage of the capacitor will have a phase angle of -90 degrees (since it lags the current). This means that the phasor for the inductor will be pointing up on the imaginary axis, and the phasor for the capacitor will be pointing down on the imaginary axis.

To find the RMS voltage over the resistor, you can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the length of the hypotenuse of the triangle formed by the phasor for the inductor and the phasor for the capacitor. This will give you the total RMS voltage in the circuit, which is equal to the RMS voltage over the resistor.

In this case, the total RMS voltage is 100 volts, so the RMS voltage over the resistor is also 100 volts. This means that the power factor is 1, since the voltage and current are in phase in a purely resistive circuit.

As for drawing the phasor diagram, you can put the 100 volts RMS for the resistor on the x-axis, since it represents the total RMS voltage in the circuit. The phasor for the inductor and the phasor for the capacitor will then be drawn relative to this 100 volt phasor, with the inductor's phasor pointing up and the capacitor's phasor pointing down on the imaginary axis.

I hope this helps and that you got the problem correct on your exam. Keep up the good work!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top