0 divisors and solutions in ax=b

  • Thread starter Thread starter Glass
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of 0 divisors in ring theory, specifically addressing the equation ax=b. It is established that if 'a' is a 0 divisor in a ring, then for any element 'b' in that ring, the equation ax=b cannot have a unique solution for 'x'. The conversation highlights the distinction between right and left 0 divisors, clarifying that a right 0 divisor does not imply it is also a left 0 divisor unless the ring is abelian. This distinction is crucial for understanding the implications of 0 divisors in algebraic structures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory and its definitions
  • Familiarity with the concepts of 0 divisors in algebra
  • Knowledge of abelian groups and their properties
  • Basic proficiency in algebraic equations and morphisms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of 0 divisors in various types of rings
  • Explore the implications of abelian and non-abelian rings
  • Learn about morphisms in the context of ring theory
  • Investigate examples of right and left 0 divisors in specific rings
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and anyone studying ring theory or exploring the properties of 0 divisors in algebraic structures.

Glass
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that if a is a 0 divisor of some ring, then for any b of the ring, ax=b cannot have one x that satisfies the equation (i.e. cannot have one solution)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


It seems to me this isn't even right. Say a is a right 0 divisor but not a left. Then ax=0 has only one solution (namely x=0) so unless all right 0 divisors are left 0 divisors (which I didn't think is true) isnt' this a contradiction of the theorem I'm trying to prove?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's telling you that a is a 0 divisor, i.e. both a right and left 0 divisor.
 
Firstly, morphism is correct, but I wanted to add this: you say

"Say a is a right 0 divisor but not a left. Then ax=0 has only one solution (namely x=0)"

This means that a right 0 divisor means a *is not* a left 0 divisor. Be careful of saying things like that. The status of a as a right 0 divisor means nothing about it as a left 0 divisor (unless the ring is abelian under *).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K