1-D Bounded, Distributed Diffusion of Contaminant

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the concentration equation for CO2 diffusion in a cylinder, specifically addressing the incorrect signs in the error function terms of the solution. The initial conditions and governing equations are established, leading to an expression involving a Dirac delta function and superposition. The user expresses confusion over the integration process, suspecting a sign error in the error function terms. A suggestion is made to simplify the integration by splitting it into two parts, which would clarify the emergence of the correct signs in the error functions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful integration techniques in obtaining accurate results for diffusion equations.
edge333
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm having some difficulty deriving the equation for a concentration of CO2 as a function of length and time. Ultimately I end up with an equation that includes the summation of two error function terms that appear to have incorrect signs.

Given:

A cylinder of infinite length has a mass input, M0 of 1.0 g CO2 added over a width, L, of 5 cm at t = 0. The cylinder has a diameter of 5 cm. Assume a fluid temperature of 25°C.

Find:

The time to reach a concentration of 2 ppm at x = 100 cm for:

1.) Molecular diffusion in air
2.) Molecular diffusion in water
3.) If the fluid was turbulent, how would that affect your answers above? Substitute a value of 1 cm2/s for D as a reflection of uniformly generated (isotropic and homogenous) turbulence in water. How does this time compare to part 2.) above?

Assumptions:
Symmetry (d/dz = d/dy = 0)
No flow (u = v = w = 0)
Conservative tracer ( r = 0)


Homework Equations



At x = 0, the mass is evenly distributed between -L/2 and L/2

Governing Equation:

\frac{\delta c}{\delta t}=D \frac{\delta^{2} c}{\delta t^{2}}

Initial conditions:

C = 0 for x < -L/2
C = 0 for x > +L/2
C = C_{0} for -L/2 < x < +L/2

Boundary conditions:

C → 0 as x → ±∞


The Attempt at a Solution



Based on a dirac delta function:

c \left( x, t \right) = \left[ \frac{M^{0}}{A \sqrt{4 \pi D t}} \right] exp \left[ - \frac{x}{4 D t} \right]

Using superposition:

dc = \frac{C_{0} A dx_{1}}{A \sqrt{4 \pi D t}} exp \left( - \frac { \left( x - x_{1} \right )^{2} }{4 D t} \right) dt

where A is the cross-sectional area of the cylinder, x1 is the location of the infinitesimal mass dm1

Integrating the sources (of contaminants) from x1→-L/2 to x1→+L/2:

c \left( x, t \right) = \int ^{L/2}_{-L/2} \frac{C_{0} }{ \sqrt{4 \pi D t}} exp \left( - \frac { \left( x - x_{1} \right )^{2} }{4 D t} \right) dx_{1}

c \left( x, t \right) = \frac{C_{0}}{\sqrt{\pi} } \left[ <br /> \int ^{L/2}_{-\infty} \frac{1}{ \sqrt{4 D t}} exp \left( - \frac { \left( x - x_{1} \right )^{2} }{4 D t} \right) dx_{1} - \int ^{-L/2}_{-\infty} \frac{1}{ \sqrt{4 D t}} exp \left( - \frac { \left( x - x_{1} \right )^{2} }{4 D t} \right) dx_{1} \right]

Via substitution:

where \eta = \frac{ \left( x - x_{1} \right) }{ \sqrt{4 D t}} and d \eta = - \frac{dx_{1} }{ \sqrt{4 D t} }

c \left( x, t \right) = \frac{C_{0}}{\sqrt{\pi} } \left[ <br /> \int ^{\infty}_{\frac{x-L/2}{\sqrt{4 D t}}} - exp \left( - \eta^{2} \right) d \eta - \int ^{\infty}_{\frac{x+L/2}{\sqrt{4 D t}}} - exp \left( - \eta^{2} \right) d \eta \right]

= \frac{C_{0}}{ 2 } \left[ - \left( 1 - erf \left( \frac{x-L/2}{\sqrt{4 D t}} \right) \right) + \left( 1 - erf \left( \frac{x+L/2}{\sqrt{4 D t}} \right) \right) \right]

= \frac{C_{0}}{ 2 } \left[ erf \left( \frac{x-L/2}{\sqrt{4 D t}} \right) - erf \left( \frac{x+L/2}{\sqrt{4 D t}} \right) \right]

From what I have seen, this is not correct though. The two error function terms should be switched such that:

= \frac{C_{0}}{ 2 } \left[ erf \left( \frac{x+L/2}{\sqrt{4 D t}} \right) - erf \left( \frac{x-L/2}{\sqrt{4 D t}} \right) \right]

I'm wondering if I switched the signs somewhere or I made a mistake in the integration, perhaps the domain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reference result you gave (with the signs switched) is correct. You must have made a mistake somewhere. It is much simpler to do the integration in a little different way than you have done. When you split it into two integrals, take one integral from -L/2 to 0, and the other integral from 0 to +L/2. The error functions with their correct signs will emerge virtually immediately from this.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top