110V wiring question (what to use, to provide minimal power to LED driver)

  • Thread starter Thread starter JohnnyAirtime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Led Power Wiring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a user seeking assistance with an LED driver that loses its memory settings when powered off by a timer. The user is using a dual 60W LED pendant light with an RGB driver that lacks non-volatile memory, causing it to revert to a default flash setting upon power restoration. Suggestions include asking the manufacturer to integrate non-volatile memory, such as an I2C serial EEPROM chip, to retain settings without powering the driver. An alternative solution proposed is to request the manufacturer to change the default settings to the user's preference. The user is looking for guidance on how to effectively communicate these needs to the manufacturer.
JohnnyAirtime
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
:smile: Okay folks... Not sure where to turn to at this moment (I'm stuck, and need some help!)... however, I am working this from two angles as I also have the China manufacturer (of my LED pendant lighting) trying to figure this out too.

I'll start with; I'm not an elect.engineer and will never pretend to be. But, I do hope that I can explain my issue(s) in terms that you all may understand. I ran across this forum when searching for answers to my problems. So I hope there's someone here, who can steer me in the right direction.

Here's what I have;
I'm using a dual 60W LED multi-chip pendant lighting. Or, "high bay" pendant light with two 60W LED chips. This light, is using an RGB driver (one per multi-chip) that has a remote control to adjust the LED. It can do several things to mix the color output, as well as strobe, flash, dimming, etc of the chip. Very nice to have, however those "features" of the driver/remote control are causing me a problem.

How it's wired currently;
I'm using an electronic timer, that shuts the driver off during certain hours of the day. The timer is pretty simple, as it connects to 110V and has 2 circuits of output. Meaning, it will turn on/off 2 different output circuits. Here's a sample of how the timer is wired to the LED light (L being "live" and N being "neutral". 3-4 and 5-6 are timer circuits on/off).
e9d8c2ea.jpg


The problem.
With the light powered on, I set the light to a specific setting (using the remote control). When the driver loses power, and shuts off via the timer... I also lose my memory settings on the LED driver. This means, when the timer again turns on the light (provides power back to the driver), the light will turn on with a default setting. This setting, just happens to be a "flash" pattern, and not the setting I set with the remote before it turned off. It tells me, there is no "non volatile memory" on the LED driver.

Making sense ?? :confused:

What my specific problem is... I need the driver to retain memory when it is turned off, via the timer.

Still working with the China manufacturer, I'm asking them to tell me how much power is it going to take to retain memory (only). As I just want that little bit... and not enough to turn the driver back on, or light the 60W multi-chip LED until the electronic timer says "on" with full 110V power.

My thought, is to use some kind of resistor (not sure what term I should be using here), between the two leads as shown in this figure;
860dd6a1.jpg


ANYONE have any ideas on what I should be asking the manufacturer, or what I should be using to make this work?? Am I on the right path?? Anything you can assist with to HELP me... would be greatly appreciated! :redface:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF.

I don't think the resistor idea is the way to go. The best way would be if the manufacturer could add in some non-volatile memory on the controller board to remember the settings. It would only take a little memory, and would probably only cost $0.10 or so in volume. They could use an I2C serial EEPROM chip, for example. The actual implementation would depend on how their controller is designed.

Alternately, ask them to change the default settings to what you want. That shouldn't be very hard for them to do.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top