2 Bits of help neede for study Logarithm+Complex number

  • Thread starter Thread starter Supernovah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bits Study
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on two mathematical problems involving logarithms and complex numbers. For the logarithm problem, the participants clarify properties of logarithms and work through the expression to arrive at the solution of log_{10}3 - \frac{1}{6}. In the second problem, they explore finding the cube root of a complex number, emphasizing the use of polar form for simplification. The conversation highlights the challenges of solving complex equations in Cartesian form and the necessity of understanding polar coordinates. Overall, the participants conclude that polar form is the more efficient method for handling complex numbers.
Supernovah
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hey there I'm studying for end of year exams and can't figure out how to do these 2 questions:

1) Express \log_{10}(2\sqrt{10}) - \frac{1}{3}\log_{10}0.8 - \log_{10}(\frac{10}{3}) in the form c + \log_{10}d

2) Simply finding the cube root of a complex number in polar/cartesian form ie: (x+yi)^3 = 8i
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
for 1) do you remember the properties of a logarithm?
log(a/b)=loga-logb
log(ab)=loga+logb
log(a^b)=bloga

can't help you with 2) though :/
 
Yeah but How do I raise the whole thing with there being a \frac{-1}{3} Multiplier there?

Oh I see now, \sqrt[3]{0.8} = 0.2

AH! I mean, \sqrt[3]{0.8} = 0.92...
 
Last edited:
yes and then since you have a log - a log you can simplify that, but I don't know how you would get c+log d unless one of those terms simplifies nicely into a base 10 log.
 
the answer scheme says the answer is \log_{10}3 - \frac{1}{6}
 
well expanding everything you'd get:
log_{10}(2)+.5log_{10}(10)-\frac{1}{3}log_{10}(4)-\frac{1}{3}log_{10}(5)-log_{10}(10)-log_{10}(3)

but I don't see how they got 1/6..
 
Supernovah said:
2) Simply finding the cube root of a complex number in polar/cartesian form ie: (x+yi)^3 = 8i

Do it the easy way: translate that Cartesian form that you have into polar form (radius and angle in the form r e^{i t}), find a cube root (straightforward in polar form) and translate that back into Cartesian form.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand the second question, is it asking for us to find the solution of that equation, or to demonstrate that it is true for all complex numbers, which it isn't...

Anyway, if its the first, its quite straight forward if we take into account 8= 2^3 and i^3 = -i.
 
Gib Z said:
I don't understand the second question, is it asking for us to find the solution of that equation, or to demonstrate that it is true for all complex numbers, which it isn't...

Anyway, if its the first, its quite straight forward if we take into account 8= 2^3 and i^3 = -i.

Then is the \sqrt[3]{8i} = -2i?

Also i figured out the logarithems one:

\log_{10}(2\sqrt{10}) - \frac{1}{3}\log_{10}0.8 - \log_{10}\frac{10}{3}
= \log_{10}2 + \log_{10}\sqrt{10} - \log_{10}\sqrt[3]{0.8} - \log_{10}10 + \log_{10}3
= \log_{10}\sqrt[3]{8} - \log_{10}\sqrt[3]{0.8} + \log_{10}\sqrt{10} - \log_{10}10 + \log_{10}3
= \log_{10}\sqrt[3]{10} + \log_{10}\sqrt{10} - \log_{10}10 + \log_{10}3
= \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{2} - 1 + \log_{10}3
= \log_{10}3 - \frac{1}{6}
 
  • #10
Supernovah said:
Then is the \sqrt[3]{8i} = -2i?

I'm sure if you just cubed both sides you could check that by yourself. But yes it is.
 
  • #11
It's likely they'll ask a question like, find the \sqrt[3]{3 + 8i} though =/
 
  • #12
These things are very easy if you know the polar form of complex numbers.

For any complex number a+bi, in polar form it can be written as \sqrt{a^2+b^2} \exp (i\cdot \arctan (b/a)). Euler's formula gives e^{ix} = \cos x + i \sin x.

Using the second formula, try proving the polar form, its just some standard trig.

Using that, the complex number inside is just 3+8i, which can be written in that polar form. Then, just cube root the \sqrt{a^2+b^2}part on the outside, and for the exponential part just divide the exponent by 3! Then If you want it back to non polar form, use Euler's formula.
 
  • #13
Thx Gib_Z I know the process of that way. Is it not doable in cartesian form?
 
  • #14
Unfortunately no, there is 1 method but it is only for square roots (it can be extended to cube and 4th roots only if you know how to solve general polynomials of degree 3 and 4, which is general is a very laborious and difficult process).
-------------------------------------------------------------------

We have the knowledge that the complex field is closed ie Any algebraic operation applied on a complex number will yield another complex number.

With this knowledge we can conclude that for any complex number, x+iy , its square root will be some other complex number, let it be of the form a+bi. We begin the method thus:

\sqrt{ x+ iy} = a+bi
x+iy = (a+bi)^2 = (a^2-b^2) + 2ab i

By comparing co efficients of real and imaginary parts, we have a pair of simultaneous equations:

a^2-b^2 = x
2ab=y

In the second equation, divide through by 2a to find an expression for b.
b=\frac{y}{2a}

Substituting that into the first simultaneous equation gives:
a^2 - \frac{y^2}{4a^2} =x

Now multiply through by 4a^2 and equate the expression to 0.

Then we have a quadratic equation in a^2. Using the quadratic formula or otherwise, solve for a^2. When we take the square root of that, we have to keep both roots, the positive and the negative, because we are not sure which one is the correct one, or in fact both may me (remember there are always 2 square roots).

So you have 2 values of a. Each one yields a value of b when put back into either of the simultaneous equations, so there are 2 values of b as well.

So now you have 4 complex numbers, 2 of them being roots and 2 of them being introduced errors. You only need to check a single one, since the 4 roots come in 2 pairs, that are positive and negatives of each other. It should appear as below:

[a+bi, -a-bi] [-a+bi, a-bi].

To test one just take the number and square it. If it is correct, so is its negative partner. If its not correct, the other group is correct.
----------------------------------------------------

As you can see, you would probably want to do Polar form instead =D
 
  • #15
Ah thanks gibz
 
Back
Top