2 charges located in the x-y plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Londonfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Plane
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the characteristics of two charges in the x-y plane, specifically charge q1 at the origin and charge q2 at (0.1, 0). The electric field at the point (0.03, 0.05) is entirely in the +y direction, indicating that q1 must be positive to achieve this effect. The calculations suggest that q2 is negative, but the derived magnitude of -29.9997 C appears excessively high, raising concerns about the accuracy of the calculations. The contributor expresses uncertainty about their approach and seeks feedback on the problem-solving process. Clarification on the calculations and the implications of charge interactions is needed for a more accurate conclusion.
Londonfish
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider 2 charges located in the x-y plane; q1 of magnitude 5 mC (millicoulombs) is located at the origin, and q2 of unknown magnitude is located at (x,y) = (0.1, 0) (in metres). The electric field E at position (0.03, 0.05) is found to be entirely in the +y direction (i.e. the x-component is zero). Determine the sign of charge q1 and the magnitude and sign of charge q2.


Homework Equations



|q| = 5mC (microCoulombs)

F= qE ; q= charge, E= electric Field
E(r) = ƩEi(r)
=1/(4*pi*ε°)*Ʃ(r-ri)*qi/(r-ri)3


The Attempt at a Solution



E1(for one charge)= 1/(4*pi*ε°)*q1/r2
= 1/(4*pi*ε°)* (0.000005 C)/0.0015m
E= 2.996*107

Then I went and did,
E=1/(4*pi*ε°)[(q1/r2)+q2/(r-r2)2]
rearrange for q2 and,
q2= [E(4*pi*ε°)+(r2/q1)](r-r2)2
q2= -29.9997 C. (This seems way to high to be correct)

So q1 is positive to make E in the + y direction.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If q2 is negative, and q1 is positive, then at a location having it's x coordinate between that of the two charges, the electric field would definitely have a non-zero x component.
 
Thanks for that. What do you think of the other part of the problem? I'm not quite sure if I'm missing something or did something wrong.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top