2-d equations of motion for a Slinky going down stairs?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the 2-D equations of motion for a Slinky descending stairs, emphasizing a planar motion without lateral movement. The initial approach considers fundamental physics equations like F = -kx and F = d(p)/dt, while recognizing the need for initial displacement. Participants note that the center of mass remains static during certain intervals, complicating the analysis. References to academic papers provide rigorous and simplified models of the Slinky's behavior under various conditions. The conversation highlights the intricate dynamics of a Slinky, suggesting that its motion can be mathematically complex.
benorin
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
This problem fascinated me in lower division physics. Find the 2-d equations of motion for a Slinky going down a flight of stairs (assuming the path of the slinky is planar; eg only going up and down and front and back, no side to side). I do confess that whilst I do love physics I’m not terribly good at it, better with math. It’s been 20 years since physics but I still remember ##F=-kx ## seems a good place to start, or was it ##F=\tfrac{d\vec{p}}{dt}##? We’ll need some initial displacement of the slinky too. I’ll need some clues as to how to proceed... we’re going to wind up with a tweaked cycloid I bet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
benorin said:
we’re going to wind up with a tweaked cycloid I bet?
I certainly would not expect that to be the case. Think about it. The center of mass, which is what you have to be looking for the motion of, is going to be static for noticeable periods while the top of the slinky moves forward and then again briefly as the top catches up on the next step down.
 
Slinkies can actually get super complicated, math-wise.
This paper has the most rigorous treatment that I know of, and includes discussions on the shapes formed by a slinky under various boundary conditions: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1403.6809.pdf

This paper from the American Journal of physics uses a simplified model of the slinky and a Lagrangian formalism to look at its stair-hopping behavior: https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1119/1.3225921
 
  • Love
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71 and anorlunda
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top