2 objects travelling in separate dimensions

  • Thread starter Thread starter nSMITH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions
AI Thread Summary
Two objects are traveling in separate dimensions, one at 0.935c in the x direction and another at 0.98c in the z direction. The discussion focuses on calculating the overall velocity of the second object from the perspective of the first using special relativity. Participants suggest using the velocity addition formula for orthogonal velocities, with one member providing a link to a proper formula that ensures the resultant velocity remains below the speed of light. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying formulas and utilizing reliable resources for complex calculations in physics. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately determining relative velocities in different dimensions.
nSMITH
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



One object is traveling in the x direction at 0.935c and another is traveling at 0.98c in the z direction. Determine the overall velocity of the second object from the point of view of the first object.

Homework Equations



v'x=(vx-v)/(1-vx*(v/c^2))

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea where to start
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Having no idea where to start, you should have checked wikipedia:P
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity-addition_formula
And off you go with a beautiful formula for adding orthogonal velocities in SR. Couple more years and I'll be able to derive it myself \m/. Till then, use google :P
 
You think I'd be asking here if I could figure it out from wikipedia/google?
 
My apologies for providing you with a wrong formula.
No apologies, however, for suggesting you to google, because after a couple more minutes... http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath216/kmath216.htm here you are, the proper formula:
v=Sqrt[1-(1-vx^2)(1-vy^2)]
I'm afraid i don't know where it comes from, but the result seems fine, as it increases both of the velocities, still being less then c, whereas the formula form wikipedia gave the result that was lesser than 0.98c.
No offence :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top