2 spin 1/2 particles in magnetic field

oww
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


See pdf file: http://www.2shared.com/file/3469465/52e02653/q3_online.html

Its the third problem I'm having trouble with. I'm pretty sure I have the two first questions correct.

Homework Equations


1)H^{'}_{\uparrow\downarrow,\downarrow\uparrow}=<\left|\uparrow\downarrow\right\rangle\left|H^'\right|\left|\downarrow\uparrow\right\rangle

The Attempt at a Solution



My idea was to compute the quantity given by 1), but I am not sure how to manage H^{'} =-\beta S^{(1)}.S^{(2)}=-\beta(S_x ^{(1)}S_x ^{(2)},S_y ^{(1)}S_y ^{(2)},S_z ^{(1)}S_z ^{(2)})

Should I try and find S_y ^{(1)}, S_y ^{(2)} and the same for the z-spinor matrices. Or is there a smarter way of doing this?

Looking forward to all the help i can get. Oistein
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You've written

H^{single-quote} =-\beta S^{(1)}.S^{(2)}=-\beta(S_x ^{(1)}S_x ^{(2)},S_y ^{(1)}S_y ^{(2)},S_z ^{(1)}S_z ^{(2)})

which you appear to have written as a vector, which it isn't:

\mathcal{H} = - \beta \mathbf{S}_1 \cdot \mathbf{S}_2 = -\beta \left[S_{x1}S_{x2} + S_{y1}S_{y2} + S_{z1}S_{z2}\right]

Now, you might not want to solve the hamiltonian in that form. Instead, look at:

(\mathbf{S}_1 + \mathbf{S}_2)^2 = S_1^2 + S_2^2 + 2\mathbf{S}_1 \cdot \mathbf{S}_2

Solve for the dot product and substitute that into the Hamiltonian. Having done that, your hamiltonian is expressed in terms of the total spin operator and the spin operators for particle 1 and particle two. These last two are proportional to the Pauli spin matrices, and you should know that \mathbf{\sigma}^2 = 1, so S_1^2 and S_2^2 just evaluate to the square of the proportionality factors. So, the only operator whose value you don't know before acting on it with your states to get the matrix element is the total spin operator.
 
Last edited:
Blah, time limit to edit has expired before I was finished editing. What's left to say is that your matrix is 4x4, so to show that the hamiltonian is non-diagonal in your basis states, you just need to find a non-zero non-diagonal entry. The problem seems to tell you which element to check. Do that and you should be done.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top