(21-23) thermodynamics problem. Finding efficiency for the human body

AI Thread Summary
To determine the efficiency of the human body while running upstairs, the relevant formula for efficiency is η = W/Qh, where W is the work done and Qh is the heat energy supplied. The kinetic energy calculated is not necessary since it does not change during the ascent; the focus should be on the work done in raising the body against gravity. The waste heat generated is 1300 J/s, and using the correct approach to find Qh from W and Qc leads to the expected efficiency of approximately 14%. The key takeaway is to concentrate on the work done in lifting the mass rather than kinetic energy changes.
qspartan570
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



While running up stairs at a (vertical) rate of 0.30 m/s, a man of 70 kg generates waste heat at a rate of 1300 J/s. What efficiency for the human body can you deduce from this?



Homework Equations



efficiency of heat engine=e=\frac{W}{Q<sub>1</sub>}=\frac{Q<sub>1</sub>-Q<sub>2</sub>}{Q<sub>2</sub>}=1-\frac{Q<sub>2</sub>}{Q<sub>1</sub>}



The Attempt at a Solution



Kinetic energy= \frac{1}{2}(70)(.30)2= 3.15

e\frac{3.15}{1300}=0.0024 X 100=0.024 %

According to the book the answer is 14%

How do I get to this answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
qspartan570 said:

Homework Statement



While running up stairs at a (vertical) rate of 0.30 m/s, a man of 70 kg generates waste heat at a rate of 1300 J/s. What efficiency for the human body can you deduce from this?
Your formula for efficiency is correct: η = W/Qh = Qh-Qc/Qh

Use W = Qh - Qc to find Qh from W and Qc.

Note: The kinetic energy of the man is irrelevant since it is not changing. The only work being done is in raising the mass of the runner through a vertical height. That is W. You are given Qc so find Qh. Then apply the formula for η.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top