4-derivative kinetic term Lagrangian

kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33

Homework Statement


Show that $$L=\phi\Box^2\phi$$ generates negative energy density.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The energy density is $$E=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\phi}}\dot{\phi}-L$$ Also the Lagrangian can be rewritten (using divergence theorem) as $$L=-\partial_\mu\phi\partial_\mu(\Box\phi)$$ So I would get $$E=-\partial_0\phi\partial_0(\Box\phi)+\partial_\mu\phi\partial_\mu(\Box\phi)$$ $$E=-\partial_x\phi\partial_x(\Box\phi)-\partial_y\phi\partial_y(\Box\phi)-\partial_z\phi\partial_z(\Box\phi)$$. Why is this negative necessarily? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kelly0303 said:
Also the Lagrangian can be rewritten (using divergence theorem) as
L=−∂μϕ∂μ(□ϕ)​
No, it cannot. You need to remove the d’Alembertian from this expression.
 
Orodruin said:
No, it cannot. You need to remove the d’Alembertian from this expression.
I am not sure what you mean. I used $$\int(\phi\Box^2\phi)=\int\partial_\mu(\phi\partial_\mu \Box \phi)-\int(\partial_\mu\phi\partial_\mu \Box \phi)$$ What is wrong? What do you mean by getting rid of the d'Alembertian?
 
kelly0303 said:
I am not sure what you mean. I used $$\int(\phi\Box^2\phi)=\int\partial_\mu(\phi\partial_\mu \Box \phi)-\int(\partial_\mu\phi\partial_\mu \Box \phi)$$ What is wrong? What do you mean by getting rid of the d'Alembertian?
This is simply not true. What you are looking for is
$$
\phi \Box \phi = \partial_\mu (\phi \partial^\mu \phi) - (\partial_\mu \phi)(\partial^\mu\phi)
$$
 
Ah, sorry. You have ##\Box^2##, not ##\Box##. In that case you cannot use the expression for the energy that you have given since your Lagrangian will contain derivatives of order higher than one.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top