Is Octuplet Mom's Reality Show Deal a New Low in Celebrity Obsession?

[LowlyPion]

Octuplet Mom May Have Already Had 6 Kids
Neighbors Tell ABC News Woman Is Single Mother Living With Parents

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=6764771&page=1

If true as reported ... why would anyone apparently take fertility drugs with 6 already?

 

[Evo]

That's appalling. It seems she may have bought the fertiltiy drugs illegally. No accredited clinic would do such a thing, supposedly. Perhaps she's mentally ill a la Angelina Jolie with her insane desire to keep popping out kids?

 

[Gokul43201]

The report does not say she took fertility drugs.

 

[humanino]

BTW, I think that makes 14. She may just be blessed by the God of fertility as well.

 

[Gokul43201]

And Jolie has popped out 3 children (including twins) and adopted 3 from Cambodia, Ethiopia and Vietnam (all were living in orphanages). I don't see the similarity between the two cases, or the basis for a diagnosis of insanity.

 

[LowlyPion]

The report does not say she took fertility drugs.

I'm fairly certain it was reported elsewhere. I believe in the interview with the doctors after delivery on MSNBC. Something to the effect that you don't have 8 without chemical assistance.

 

[LowlyPion]

That's appalling. It seems she may have bought the fertiltiy drugs illegally. No accredited clinic would do such a thing, supposedly. Perhaps she's mentally ill a la Angelina Jolie with her insane desire to keep popping out kids?

Well Bradgelina do have the resources to care for about as many as they want to pop out or adopt. It wouldn't be my choice, but if that is how they want to fill their lives, ...

But in this case 14 kids in a 3 bedroom house?

That will definitely affect the resale value of the home.

 

[fileen]

I don't know about the U.S. but in Canada it would be questioned whether she should be allowed to keep them all as a single mom with only 1 income in a 3 bedroom house...
I can't imagine giving birth to one and ever wanting to do it again, let alone do it again 8 times in a row...

 

[FredGarvin]

This goes right up there with the sick-o's in Arkansas or wherever that have 16 kids and keep going. This is a sickness. This is nature's way of the need to porpagate the species taken to an absurd level.

 

[LowlyPion]

This goes right up there with the sick-o's in Arkansas or wherever that have 16 kids and keep going. This is a sickness. This is nature's way of the need to porpagate the species taken to an absurd level.

Used to be in a more agrarian world that large families meant a ready made workforce. Increase the brood of kids like growing a herd of milk cows. With disease being treated haphazardly, getting all the kids to adulthood was undoubtedly a challenge.

For instance I look at my family tree and see family sizes of 5 to 9 kids through the 18th and 19th century and I don't think that was really all that uncommon. (And maybe 1 sometimes 2 pre-adult deaths per generation as I recall.) And they were for the most part farm owners. But the twentieth century saw my forbears have just 2 and 3 kids a generation. I think, without researching it, that experience likely mirrors, society generally as it developed and expanded with US manifest destiny.

The thing that I have to wonder about now though is the idea that there may be some procreation going on out there that may be motivated by the idea that births are a perverse source of revenue in the form of welfare. Like gee if I had more kids I could get more food stamps, and subsidies. Hence I don't know that it is necessarily sick so much as narcissistic and ill considered.

 

[Evo]

The report does not say she took fertility drugs.

Yes, it does.

The woman's mother, Angela Suleman, told the Los Angeles Times that her daughter had indeed undergone fertility treatments and that the embryos were implanted last year. According to Suleman, when the woman learned that she was carrying multiple babies, she opted not to reduce the number of embryos.

 

[Astronuc]

Family: Octuplets' mother has 6 other children
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090130/ap_on_re_us/octuplets

WHITTIER, Calif. – The woman who gave birth to octuplets this week has six other children and never expected to have eight more when she took fertility treatment, her mother said.

Angela Suleman said her daughter expects a big challenge raising 14 children. The good news, she said, is all the babies appear healthy.
. . . .
Suleman's daughter gave birth to the octuplets Monday at a hospital in Bellflower but has requested that doctors keep her name confidential. Media knew little about the woman until a family acquaintance told CBS' "The Early Show" on Thursday that the mother is "fairly young" and lives with her parents and her six children.

. . . .

Hay caramba! So what about the father(s)?

If she's not married, why the heck is she taking fertility treatment?

 

[Gokul43201]

Yes, it does.

You're right. I have no idea how I missed that paragraph. Thanks for pointing it out.

 

[The Dagda]

If she's not married, why the heck is she taking fertility treatment?

Is that a conservative opinion there? Are couples who are not tied, not allowed to have children? Marriage these days is seen by many as little more than a tax break I think. A lot of people get married simply because it's a social convention at least in the UK, it certainly isn't in the majority of cases religious. If you think about it in a detached manner, apart from the legal and financial incentives, what is the difference between living with someone forever and being married?

 

[Astronuc]

Is that a conservative opinion there? Are couples who are not tied, not allowed to have children? Marriage these days is seen by many as little more than a tax break I think. A lot of people get married simply because it's a social convention at least in the UK, it certainly isn't in the majority of cases religious. If you think about it in a detached manner, apart from the legal and financial incentives, what is the difference between living with someone forever and being married?

I suppose some might consider my opinion conservative. So be it.

Actually, it's simply a matter of responsibility.

I'm also just curious about the absence of the father(s). For me, if I get a woman pregnant, I'm committed to that woman and child (or children) until I stop breathing.

I certainly don't know all the details, but I have to wonder if she is expecting to be supported by the state. It's one thing to have 14 children and support them oneself (which I don't see a single adult doing), but it's quite another matter to have numerous children and expect others to support one's children. It seems it's selfish.

If I'm going to live with someone forever, I'm going to get married (which I did going on 27 years + 1 year of being engaged while living apart except for weekends and holidays). Beyond legal and financial matters, it's simply a matter of commitment.

I've seen many people who live together (as well as married), and then split up. It seems, based on what I've observed, that when a couple co-habits, one or both is not necessarily committed to a long-term, exclusive relationship (I've seen that in marriages too).

 

[The Dagda]

I see I agree with your concerns about a partner, but I suspect the treatment wouldn't have been tried if she didn't have a long term partner. Not sure though. If you think about it a lesbian couple would probably have the same issues, so it doesn't really matter about marriage.

As for your views about marriage I'm pretty sure you are not alone.

However it's possible to make a commitment without it being legally binding, it's possible to live have children and die without ever being married, the difference is more or less one of incentive and tradition and social conformity looked at impartially. In todays day and age looking at if someone is married as an indication of their fitness to raise children seems obsolete. A relationship will do.

 

[Astronuc]

I'm just curious about whether the father(s) are supporting the woman and children.


I knew a woman who was one of three sisters, each of whom had a different father. None of the women knew who the father was. The mom just got pregnant and had the girls. The mother finally married, but from what I learned, the girls had a pretty rough time, and the woman I knew ran away from home at 16 and lived on the streets (sleeping in the yards of friends or neighbors). She finally settled down at 18, got her GED, and settled for menial or clerical jobs.

I'm just puzzled why a woman needs to take fertility treatment after having 6 kids, and what happened to the father(s).

 

[Evo]

The fathers may have been a sperm bank.

 

[LowlyPion]

... but I suspect the treatment wouldn't have been tried if she didn't have a long term partner.

This is where I think it gets murky as to who would reasonably have assisted in such "treatment"? With 6 already on the shop floor being processed toward adulthood, another round of fertility encouragement seems like an extraordinary lapse in professional judgment, ... if a professional was involved.

I'd think if a doctor knowingly engaged in such treatments that he would begin to assume liability for his poor judgment.

There has to be an adult somewhere in this process.

 

[Flat]

It seems she may have bought the fertiltiy drugs illegally.

I could see that. Apart from overseas pharmacies, Clomid and a few other fertility drugs are also abused by bodybuilders, which there is a huge black market for.

 

[Vanadium 50]

It would be interesting to know the fraction of people who think that she had too many kids who would also say they support reproductive freedom.

 

[Gokul43201]

It would be interesting to know the fraction of people who think that she had too many kids who would also say they support reproductive freedom.

Probably a similar fraction to those who agree with Voltaire's views on freedoms.

 

[LowlyPion]

It would be interesting to know the fraction of people who think that she had too many kids who would also say they support reproductive freedom.

That's a good point, though I think when you begin to factor gross irresponsibility into the equation, where someone is disproportionately burdening others with the human obligation of caring for lives of innocents, born through no fault of their own, there begins to be some blow back.

 

[The Dagda]

That's a good point, though I think when you begin to factor gross irresponsibility into the equation, where someone is disproportionately burdening others with the human obligation of caring for lives of innocents, born through no fault of their own, there begins to be some blow back.

Saying that such "celebrity" families, usually make a bit in endorsements. And companies like to send them a lifetime supply of x and y. They may even come out of it with more money than they would otherwise. It's hard to say.

 

[Gokul43201]

Oops! I was looking at the wrong side of the reproductive freedom coin, wasn't I?

 

[LowlyPion]

Saying that such "celebrity" families, usually make a bit in endorsements. And companies like to send them a lifetime supply of x and y. They may even come out of it with more money than they would otherwise. It's hard to say.

Perhaps. But the public appetite is for novelty. And promotion dollars feeds off that appetite.

Start having hundreds of baby dynamos churning 'em out half dozen at a whack and I'd think the public would be less amused by the novelty offered by the fertility pharmacopoeia. And the Gerbers and Pampers of the world would in turn be less inclined to support these legions of excess.

 

[The Dagda]

Perhaps. But the public appetite is for novelty. And promotion dollars feeds off that appetite.

Start having hundreds of baby dynamos churning 'em out half dozen at a whack and I'd think the public would be less amused by the novelty offered by the fertility pharmacopoeia. And the Gerbers and Pampers of the world would in turn be less inclined to support these legions of excess.

Well obviously but in this case I doubt they'll be having more children so it is a possibility that they may make out like bandits from this. The poor often fire out more babies than they can afford, it's ubiquitous. The poor don't generally go mental and start firing out as many as they can though not even Catholics.

 

[fileen]

I think its funny that she wants her name to be confidential, its going to be hard to hide all those babies.

 

[Gokul43201]

I think its funny that she wants her name to be confidential, its going to be hard to hide all those babies.

The news reporters stuck to the letter of the law and did not disclose her name. But they did tell you her mother's name, and city of residence. Might as well have thrown in a telephone number as well.

 

[turbo]

I think its funny that she wants her name to be confidential, its going to be hard to hide all those babies.

She's not going to hide them for long. 8 babies at once is a good-sized litter, and she's going to milk that for all it's worth. It won't be long before her agent, her publicist, and her lawyers start making some noise.

 

[Astronuc]

8 Is Enough: The Limits to Human Reproduction
http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20090130/sc_livescience/8isenoughthelimitstohumanreproduction

Eight kids at once. The mind boggles. The mind is also pretty creeped out by the thought of one tiny baby after another coming out of a woman as if she were a mouse.

It's great those octuplets are here and healthy, but really, humans aren't designed to have litters.

It's basic energetics. Every individual has only so much energy. Some energy is spent staying alive - that is, finding food and not being somebody else's food - and what's left over can be spent on reproduction. In other words, there are limits to reproduction.
. . . .

I wish the children well.

 

[LowlyPion]

Last March, Suleman filed bankruptcy, claiming nearly $1 million in liabilities — mostly because of a bad house investment, her attorney said. Countrywide Home Loans approved a $492,000 mortgage for Suleman in 2006 for a second home she bought in Whittier for $615,000. In 2008, the bank began foreclosure procedures. The house was sold in August for $369,375.

In an interview with the Los Angeles Times on Thursday, Suleman said her daughter did not expect to have octuplets, but that all the implanted embryos "happened to take."

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/01/family-in-octup.html

So she was in bankruptcy. AND she went ahead and had 8 embryos implanted? And she already had 6 children?

This isn't just under the counter fertility drugs gone awry.

 

[Vanadium 50]

8 babies at once is a good-sized litter, and she's going to milk that for all it's worth.

No pun intended?

 

[TheStatutoryApe]

I heard local (LA area) talk show hosts discussing this on my way to work.
they've received a bunch of information for various sources and are unsure how reliable it is but they gave a rather full picture of what they gathered.
if I remember this all correctly she was originally in a relationship, engaged I believe, and received fertility treatments which resulted in the first litter of six. supposedly her fiance, upon finding out she was having six babies, left her.
as to whether she is receiving child support there is rumour that she was artificially inseminated with donor sperm which would mean there is no father.
for the second pregnancy, unless I missed something, I believe she was single and supposedly jobless taking care of her first six and receiving welfare. supposedly she went to a fertility clinic in mexico and was artificially inseminated. so again supposedly no father.

some or much of that may be inaccurate.

 

[Gokul43201]

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-octuplets31-2009jan31,0,6246659.story

if I remember this all correctly she was originally in a relationship, engaged I believe, and received fertility treatments which resulted in the first litter of six. supposedly her fiance, upon finding out she was having six babies, left her.

The LATimes story says she had twins and 4 other children, before the octuplets. I think that likely rules out the possibility of sextuplets (sextuplets, then octuplets - jeez, that would be crazy!)

as to whether she is receiving child support there is rumour that she was artificially inseminated with donor sperm

This seems to be true.

I believe she was single and supposedly jobless taking care of her first six and receiving welfare.

Also confirmed.

supposedly she went to a fertility clinic in mexico and was artificially inseminated.

Nothing is said about this, so it is still a possibility.

 

[Dadface]

Who needs fertility drugs?Just call for me...superstud.

 

[Evo]

Grandma: Octuplets mom obsessed with having kids

The woman who gave birth to octuplets this week conceived all 14 of her children through in vitro fertilization, is not married and has been obsessed with having children since she was a teenager, her mother said.

Angela Suleman told The Associated Press she was not supportive when her daughter, Nadya Suleman, decided to have more embryos implanted last year.

She said she warned her daughter that when she gets home from the hospital, "I'm going to be gone."

Angela Suleman said her daughter always had trouble conceiving and underwent in vitro fertilization treatments because her fallopian tubes are "plugged up."

There were frozen embryos left over after her previous pregnancies and her daughter didn't want them destroyed, so she decided to have more children.

Her daughter's obsession with children caused Angela Suleman considerable stress, so she sought help from a psychologist, who told her to order her daughter out of the house.

Yolanda Garcia, 49, of Whittier, said she helped care for Nadya Suleman's autistic son three years ago.

"From what I could tell back then, she was pretty happy with herself, saying she liked having kids and she wanted 12 kids in all," Garcia told the Long Beach Press-Telegram.

"She told me that all of her kids were through in vitro, and I said 'Gosh, how can you afford that and go to school at the same time?"' she added. "And she said it's because she got paid for it."

Garcia said she did not ask for details.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090131/ap_on_re_us/octuplets

 

[Astronuc]

"And she said it's because she got paid for it."

And that is SO WRONG!

. . . conceived all 14 of her children through in vitro fertilization, is not married and has been obsessed with having children since she was a teenager, . . .

She probably meets the legal definition of insane, the inability to discern 'right from wrong'. She needs psychiatric help.

 

[LowlyPion]

There were frozen embryos left over after her previous pregnancies and her daughter didn't want them destroyed, so she decided to have more children.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090131/ap_on_re_us/octuplets

I see. Just cleaning out the fridge. Making sure nothing goes to waste?

 

[Evo]

I see. Just cleaning out the fridge. Making sure nothing goes to waste?

It would appear that way.

 

[Astronuc]

I have to wonder what is meant by "And she said it's because she got paid for it." Does this mean she expects the taxpayers to pay for her selfish and irresponsible behavior, or is she planning to sell her offspring?

 

[LowlyPion]

Maybe someone told her once they liked the way she shook her moneymaker? And she just misapplied that to her life?

But you can't call her completely irresponsible. After all she was really only planning on having another 6 not all the 8 that took.

 

[The Dagda]

I have to wonder what is meant by "And she said it's because she got paid for it." Does this mean she expects the taxpayers to pay for her selfish and irresponsible behavior, or is she planning to sell her offspring?

No but as said the business world might. Her motivation was to have another baby than the six she already had, we should probably hold off making judgements until we know the whole story.

 

[LowlyPion]

..., we should probably hold off making judgements until we know the whole story.

What fun is that?

 

[The Dagda]

What fun is that?

Good point, I was just being needlessly wise, carry on.

 

[Evo]

No but as said the business world might. Her motivation was to have another baby than the six she already had, we should probably hold off making judgements until we know the whole story.

Not according to people that knew her, she was wanting a dozen kids.

 

[OmCheeto]

First thing that popped into my mind:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/U0kJHQpvgB8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/U0kJHQpvgB8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

DVD available for $10https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000A2UBNE/?tag=pfamazon01-2099

 

[lisab]

Can you imagine a dog having 64 puppies ?!?

 

[LowlyPion]

Can you imagine a dog having 64 puppies ?!?

That would set up a real competition come feeding time. At from between 6 - 10 nipples, they'd need to be fed in 7 - 11 shifts. I think at that point feeding would just be considered to be continuous.

Poor mom.

 

[Dadface]

And does the ***** expect that her owners should pay for her selfish an irresponsible behaviour?