A conceptual question about the force of light waves when reflected

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the forces exerted on a card by electromagnetic (EM) waves based on whether the waves are absorbed or reflected. When the card absorbs the wave, the force calculated is 4 x 10^-8 N. However, when the card reflects the wave, the force is doubled due to the need for a greater change in momentum. This is explained by the requirement to not only stop the incoming wave but also to reverse its direction, necessitating an impulse that is twice as large. The conceptual understanding highlights the relationship between force, momentum, and impulse in the context of light wave interactions.
RubberBandit
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

An EM wave with intensity=200 W/m^2 is normal to a black .2m x .3m card that absorbs 100% of the wave. (a) Find the force exerted on the card by the radiation. (b) Find the force exerted by the same wave if the card reflects 100% of the light.



Homework Equations


Pr=I/c Pressure=F/A


The Attempt at a Solution


Part (a) I solved. (I/c)(0.2*0.3)=F=4*10^-8 N
Part (b) I know is double the force.

My question is conceptual. Why is the force doubled when the EM wave is reflected?

Thank you for any and all replies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it in terms of momentum. Force is what is required to change momentum; a net change in momentum due to a force is usually called an impulse. In the case of absorption, you only need the card to provide an impulse equal in magnitude to the momentum, which is opposite in direction to the light wave. This will exactly stop the wave. On the other hand, if you want to reflect the wave, you need to not only bring its velocity to zero but then to send it back in the opposite direction at the incoming speed. In other words you need to impart an impulse twice as large because the magnitude of the change in momentum is twice as large.
 
That makes perfect sense. Thank you Steely Dan.

PS Love your handle. Get along Kid Charlemagne.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top