A cylinder full of water on a scale

AI Thread Summary
Heating a cylinder full of water on a scale does not change its weight significantly, as the mass remains constant despite the introduction of energy. While heating does cause the water to expand, this expansion may result in a slight buoyancy effect that could make the scale read a bit lighter, but this would be negligible. The energy added through heating is minimal in terms of mass change, requiring an impractically large amount of energy to register on a scale. Additionally, convection currents in the air around the cylinder might affect the scale reading, but the overall weight remains unchanged. Thus, the weight of the cylinder and water is essentially constant, ignoring any relativistic effects.
nargesh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
if we have cylinder full of water on a scale the we heat it, does the scale show any difference in weight of cylinder? water don't evaporate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say no. Heating a liquid does introduce energy into the cylinder and energy is really a form of mass (and the other way around), but you'd need a lot of energy to see it on a scale. And I mean a lot of energy.
 
The heated cylinder would expand, which due to buoyancy might cause it to be a little bit "lighter" according to the scale. You'd probably need a hell of a scale to pick this up.

There would be movement of air around the cylinder due to convection. I suppose that could also be picked up depending on the scale.

In any case, the actual weight of the cylinder would be unchanged neglecting relativistic effects.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top