A different bouncy ball question....

  • Thread starter Thread starter SHO-NUFF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the additional energy required for a bouncy ball to return to its original drop height after bouncing. The ball, with a mass of 7.362 g, bounces to a height of 0.835 m after being dropped from 1.03 m, indicating a retained energy fraction of 0.811. To achieve the original height of 1.03 m on the first bounce, the ball must be dropped from a height of approximately 1.27 m. The potential energy difference can be calculated using the formula W = mg(1.27m - 1.03m). The user seeks clarification on applying this energy to the initial kinetic energy for the desired bounce height.
SHO-NUFF
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So I've seen all over the internet about the efficiency of a bouncy ball and how high will it bounce on the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. bounces? That's easy to figure out. Now I was thinking about it for a while and the question that hit me was how much energy do I need to add to the initial drop in order for the ball to return to the exact original height? I have a table that's 1.03 m high, the ball has a mass of 7.362 g and a density of 0.90 g/cm^3. The ball is bouncing off a concrete floor that, from what I can find, has a density of 2,400 kg/cm^3. The ball also take approximately 0.5 seconds to fall and impact the floor and approximately another 0.25 seconds to reach the height of the first bounce of about 0.835 m.

I'm not sure if all this information is all relevant but it's what I've observed by simply bouncing the ball a couple dozen times. Please someone help point me in the right direction here. Again, what I'm looking for is the amount of energy required to be added in order for the ball to return to the exact original drop height on the first bounce. I'm missing something, overthinking it, or both.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using an Earth constant gravity approximation, the height is proportional to the potential energy of the ball. If the ball height is 1.03m before the first bounce and 0.835m after the first bounce, the fraction of energy retained after a bounce is
0.835/1.03 = 0.811
So, to bounce up to a height of 1.03m, you need to drop it from a higher height
1.03m / 0.811 = 1.27m
The potential energy is mgh, so the extra energy to lift to 1.27m is
W = mg(1.27m-1.03m)
(You shouldn't round the quantities until the end.)
 
Khashishi,

Thanks for the tip on rounding. What if I wanted to bounce it from a given height (in this case 1.03 m) and have it return to the exact height it was released from though?
 
Calculate the difference in potential energy as I have shown above, and apply that energy to the initial kinetic energy of the ball.
 
Thanks for the help! My apologies for not getting the first time around. I'm new to physics.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top