A First Course in String Theory - Quick Calculation 2.5

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the identification of the plane (x,y) under the transformation (x,y) → (x+2πR, y+2πR), which results in a non-compact space. The fundamental domain is defined as x ∈ (0, 2πR) and y ∈ (0, 2πR) for independent identifications, but this fails for the combined identification. The resulting space is an infinite band, as the coordinates x and y alter together, preventing a limited fundamental domain. The conclusion emphasizes that for n-dimensional spaces to be compact, identifications must be independent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic string theory concepts from Zwiebach's "A First Course in String Theory"
  • Familiarity with Cartesian coordinates and transformations
  • Knowledge of compact spaces in topology
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notations and equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of compactness in higher-dimensional spaces
  • Explore the concept of fundamental domains in topology
  • Learn about the role of identifications in string theory
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of toroidal structures
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, particularly those studying string theory, mathematicians interested in topology, and anyone exploring the implications of coordinate transformations in theoretical physics.

adartsesirhc
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Zwiebach's A First Course in String Theory
Quick Calculation 2.5: Consider the plane (x,y) with the identification

(x,y)\rightarrow (x+2\pi R,y+2\pi R).

What is the resulting space?

Homework Equations


A one dimensional line with identification x\rightarrow x+2\pi R is a circle.

A plane with identifications
(x,y)\rightarrow (x+2\pi R,y)
(x,y)\rightarrow (x,y+2\pi R)
is a torus.

The Attempt at a Solution


The identification is just the combination of both of the torus identifications... but how would I join two boundaries with a single identification? And what would be the fundamental domain? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm... I clicked on the link, but it appears to be invalid.
 
It may be easier to think of it this way: (x,y) \rightarrow (x,y) + 2\pi R (1,1).
 
adartsesirhc said:
Hmm... I clicked on the link, but it appears to be invalid.

That's strange. I made the link on my computer at work, and it works here at home.

Another method: try coordinates x' = \left(x + y \right)/\sqrt{2} and y' = \left(x - y \right)/\sqrt{2}.
 
Dear adartsesirhc, I wish I could do some help. I'm very angry with the administrator's slow permission, and I have to repost via quick reply.

As you know, the Caretessian plane of $xoy$ is compact for the identification:
$$
x\sim x+2\pi R
y\sim y+2\pi R
$$
where x and y vary independently and individually, and the fundamental domain is
$$
x\in (0, 2\pi R), y\in (0, 2\pi R).
$$
However, for the identification of
$$
(x,y)\sim (x+2\pi R, y+2\pi R),
$$
the plane will no longer be compact. And because $x$ and $y$ alter together by the vector $\lambda(2\pi R, 2\pi R)$, $\lambda \in R$, there's no limited fundamental domain which could generate the 2-dimensional space via the identification.

In another sense, nevertheless, we could also attain a generalized fundamental domain. Firstly set the 2D Cartessian coordinates on the plane, with pionts $A(-\pi R, 0)$, $A'(0, -\pi R)$, $C(0, \pi R)$, $C'(\pi R, 0)$. see figure 1:

(figure 1)

and the so-called domain is the space between the lines $x+y=-\pi R$ and $x+y=\pi R$ and goes to infinity along the line. Notice that although the domain is confined between the two lines, there's no constraints along the lines, so the it is an infinite band.

Now, we could glue the boundary lines of $A-A'$ with $C-C'$, see figure2:

(figure 2)

All in all, we should notice that, for the identification of $(x,y)\sim (x+2\pi R, y+2\pi R)$, the 2D space is no longer compact due to co-movement of x and y.

As a natural extension, for n-dimensional space located $(x_1, x_2, x_3, ..., x_n)$, if the space is to be compact, the identifications for each variable should be independent to one another. Only in this way, can a limited domain exist to cover the whole space via the transformation of identifications.

Sorry that I couldnot get the two figures uploaded, please contact tianwj1@gmail.com for them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K