A multiple concept problem thermal expansion/stress

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving thermal expansion and stress in steam beams with concrete. The user is struggling to understand how to apply the equation for stress, specifically using Young's Modulus, to find the pressure exerted by the concrete due to temperature changes. They have calculated part of the equation but are confused about how to reach the book's answer of 4.6 x 10^7 N/m^2. Additional confusion arises from converting decimal answers to scientific notation, which is also addressed in the conversation. The user expresses motivation to learn despite the challenges faced after years away from science.
Janinever
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi guys!

I think I need to explain myself before I ask for the advice :) I'm 27 (so been in grade 12 ages ago) - I didn't have science, I wrote it years later. Now I'm enrolled for a Bsc degree in the hope of getting into medical school (very tough in South Africa). I'm putting a lot of time into studying and started physics now - but I'm clueless - so have to start from the bottom and hit a bit of a roadblock!

I got a multiple concept problem - I managed to follow along in the book to where they reached the section just before the answer... but how they get from the final part of the equation to the answer is a mystery - and I see many more like these in the book but no explanation so I'm guessing this part was sort of "assumed knowledge from school".

Homework Statement



The problem involves steam beams with concrete on the sides. So with the increase in temp the beams have no space to expand but the concrete is exerting pressure to avoid expansion of the beams. They want to know what pressure the concrete is exerting.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



So in the book they mention and explain Youngs Modulus

After some equations have been substituted into others (this i understand which is why I haven't included this) you end up with

Stress = Y (alpha) (T-T0)

and we also know that
y=2.0 x 10^11 N/m^2 and (alpha) = 12 x 10^-6 (Celsius degrees)^-1

Now if you put that into the above stress equation you get :

(2.0 x 10^11 N/m^2) {12 x 10^-6(Celsuis degrees)^-1}(42-23)And now I have no clue further...

the books answer is 4.6 x 10^7 N/m^2

I have no idea how they even get close to this answer. If anyone can help me please explain as if I am a little kiddie :) Doing this after SO many years is really difficult but with many hours of studying I'm really motivated to learn!

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Janinever! http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif

Stress = Y (alpha) (T-T0)

and we also know that
y=2.0 x 10^11 N/m^2 and (alpha) = 12 x 10^-6 (Celsius degrees)^-1

Now if you put that into the above stress equation you get :

(2.0 x 10^11 N/m^2) {12 x 10^-6(Celsuis degrees)^-1


And now I have no clue further...

the books answer is 4.6 x 10^7 N/m^2
The books answer differs from your expression by a factor x19.2

Could this hint at somethinghttps://www.physicsforums.com/images/icons/icon5.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not sure about the 19.2?

I find the answers using the calculator - but how to write that answer in the terms of for example (4.6 x 10^7) is confusing...

I sort of get how it could get to there but further on in the book there are answers such as 5.6 10^-2 (for these I also get a normal decimal on the calculator but have no clue how they convert it to those answers).

Sorry for sounding so confusing!
 
Janinever said:
Not sure about the 19.2?
Now that you've gone back and fixed it, I think you agree with the book. Yes? :smile:
I sort of get how it could get to there but further on in the book there are answers such as 5.6 10^-2 (for these I also get a normal decimal on the calculator but have no clue how they convert it to those answers).
You need some work on converting from 0.0002 to 2.0x10-4 ? Maybe someone can point to a good site. That's converting from decimal notation to scientific notation. Maybe try a google search for a tutorial on that topic.
 
Wonderful, now I know what it's called :) (have a lot ahead of me!) - I'm doing a maths module as well, I should probably get a bit further with that before tackling the physics - scientific notation seems to be one of the next sections. Thanks so much! :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top