A problem regarding to Lagrangian in Classical Mechanics

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in classical mechanics, specifically related to Lagrangian mechanics. The original poster is tasked with demonstrating that a modified Lagrangian, L', satisfies Lagrange's equations when an arbitrary differentiable function F is added to the original Lagrangian L.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the conditions under which the modified Lagrangian L' satisfies Lagrange's equations. Some participants suggest that the original poster needs to expand the terms involving F into partial derivatives and question the assumption that certain derivatives equal zero.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering guidance on how to approach the differentiation of the function F. There is a recognition of the need to carefully handle the indices and summations in the equations. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the expansion of derivatives.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the arbitrary nature of the function F, which complicates the differentiation process. The discussion also highlights potential confusion regarding the treatment of indices and the application of multivariable differentiation techniques.

iiternal
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a problem regarding to lagrangian.

If L is a Lagrangian for a system of n degrees of freedom satisfying Lagrange's equations, show by direct substitution that

L' = L + \frac{d F(q_1,...,q_n,t)}{d t}

also satisfies Lagrange's equations where F is any ARBITRARY BUT DIFFERENTIABLE function of its arguments.

Homework Equations


Lagrange's equations:
\frac{\partial L}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{d t}\frac{\partial L}{\dot{\partial q_i}} =0

The Attempt at a Solution


Equivalently we have to find
\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{d t}\frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot{q_i}} =0
It is obvious that \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot{q_i}}=0.
But how can I get \frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}=0 ?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, iiternal! :smile:

This looks like an exercise in multivariable differentiation.

Let's start with your relevant equation.
You seem to have dropped a partial derivative there...

I'm afraid that since F is an arbitrary function of ##q_i##, you won't get ##\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}=0##.

I believe you have to substitute L' in Lagrange's equation and expand everything.
This means expanding dF/dt into partial derivatives.
Do you know how to do that?
 
Thank you very much! You are absolutely right!

let ## G = \frac{dF}{dt} = \sum\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}\dot{q_i}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t}##;
Substitute it into Lagrange's Equation
## \frac{\partial G}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial G}{\partial \dot{q_i}}
= (\frac{\partial^2F}{\partial q_i^2}\dot{q} + \frac{\partial^2F}{\partial q_i\partial t}) - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} ##

I believe the last term can somehow cancel both the first two terms.
When I tried to expand the last term, I faced another problem
## \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} = \frac{\partial }{\partial q}\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} + ?##
How can I take derivative of the denominator of a differentiation?

I like Serena said:
Welcome to PF, iiternal! :smile:

This looks like an exercise in multivariable differentiation.

Let's start with your relevant equation.
You seem to have dropped a partial derivative there...

I'm afraid that since F is an arbitrary function of ##q_i##, you won't get ##\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}=0##.

I believe you have to substitute L' in Lagrange's equation and expand everything.
This means expanding dF/dt into partial derivatives.
Do you know how to do that?
 
iiternal said:
Thank you very much! You are absolutely right!

let ## G = \frac{dF}{dt} = \sum\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i}\dot{q_i}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t}##;
Substitute it into Lagrange's Equation
## \frac{\partial G}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial G}{\partial \dot{q_i}}
= (\frac{\partial^2F}{\partial q_i^2}\dot{q} + \frac{\partial^2F}{\partial q_i\partial t}) - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} ##

I believe the last term can somehow cancel both the first two terms.
When I tried to expand the last term, I faced another problem
## \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} = \frac{\partial }{\partial q}\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} + ?##
How can I take derivative of the denominator of a differentiation?

Good! :)

I'm afraid you should not use the index i everywhere and keep the summations.

Your equations should read:
## G = \frac{dF}{dt} = \sum\limits_j\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_j}\dot{q_j}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} ##

Substitute it into Lagrange's Equation
## \frac{\partial G}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial G}{\partial \dot{q_i}}
= \sum\limits_j ... ##

And:
## \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} = \sum\limits_j {\partial^2 F \over \partial q_j\partial q_i} \dot q_j + {\partial^2 F \over \partial t\partial q_i}##
 
Great !
Thank you very much!
Happy New Year.

I like Serena said:
Good! :)

I'm afraid you should not use the index i everywhere and keep the summations.

Your equations should read:
## G = \frac{dF}{dt} = \sum\limits_j\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_j}\dot{q_j}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} ##

Substitute it into Lagrange's Equation
## \frac{\partial G}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial G}{\partial \dot{q_i}}
= \sum\limits_j ... ##

And:
## \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial F}{\partial q_i} = \sum\limits_j {\partial^2 F \over \partial q_j\partial q_i} \dot q_j + {\partial^2 F \over \partial t\partial q_i}##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K