A question about a visual effect on a rotating prism

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the visual effects observed when a rectangular prism is rotated, specifically the appearance of smooth, circular edges and diffused vertices. Participants note that this phenomenon is linked to the human visual system's perception, rather than the prism's physical properties. The conversation highlights the need for a deeper mathematical or physical explanation of these visual effects. There is also mention of related puzzles involving fast-spinning objects, indicating a broader interest in the physics of motion and perception. The inquiry remains focused on understanding the underlying principles behind the observed effects.
Breo
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Hello folks,

I was playing with a rectangular prism 4x4x3 (almost a cube) and I was giving him a rotating movement with the hand over the table so I could see a visual effect I have seen many times in my life and now I remembered to ask about it.

So when I give to it an impulse and it start to rotate I can see very well defined smooth edges, well really a circular edge, with the actual vertex diffusal. In other words, like if it was a cylinder rotating with almost invisible vertex and edges.

I understand that we see the only constant points in the rotation move, this is the incircle (or in-crylinder) of the prism. The vertex only passes in discrete times over the same points so that is why it becomes diffusal.

However I want to know the mathematical/physical explanation of this.

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not quite sure what you mean. If I understand you correctly, what you are asking about is a function of the physiology of the human visual system rather than an intrinsic property of the prism.
 
Breo said:
Over I want to know the mathematical/physical explanation of this.
Haven't you explained it already? What exactly is still unclear? You see the cylinder where there always is a part of the spinning prism. The rest is a mix of prism and background.

Here is a related puzzle, based on spinning stuff fast:

 
A.T., you had better be prepared to provide me the solution to that... o_O
 
A.T. said:
Haven't you explained it already? What exactly is still unclear? You see the cylinder where there always is a part of the spinning prism. The rest is a mix of prism and background.

Here is a related puzzle, based on spinning stuff fast:

I suppose... but only in a very lay way... There must be mathematics behind... :/

I am sorry for my language barriers :P
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top