A Question about Chromatography

  • Thread starter Thread starter kalladin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chromatography
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the discrepancy between an experimentally determined total exchange capacity of 2.74 meq/g for a resin column and the manufacturer's specification of 3.4 meq/g. Participants clarify that "meq" stands for milliequivalents, a measure of ionic concentration relevant in ion exchange chromatography. One contributor explains that meq indicates the amount of ion bound to the resin and emphasizes that variations in experimental results could arise from factors such as the number of replicates conducted. The potential compromise of surface area when the resin is packed in a column is also suggested as a reason for the difference in values. The conversation hints at the possibility of seeking further insights from a chemistry-focused forum for more specialized guidance.
kalladin
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
I calculated the total exchange capacity of a column per gram of dry weight of resin to be 2.74 meq/g. This value comes from experimental values. However, the manufacturer's specifications for the number of exchange sites is 3.4 meq/g.

1. What's meq? :blushing: I know this means milliequivalents of the anion/cation, but what does it mean? I think I'm contradicting myself by asking the question, but please help out to clarify if you can.

2. Why would there be such a big difference between the experimentally determined number of exchange sites and the manufacturer's specifications? I suspect that when the resin is packed in a column some surface area is compromised?

Please help me out here :smile:

Thanks,

K.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I'm not all that familiar with ion exchange chromatography, but I did some work with HPLC and GC and I think I can help. Classically, Meq provides the concentration of a substance, that is in ionic form, in solution, or more likely in this case the amount of ion bound to resin. Solutions of non-ionic sunstances should not be expressed in this manner. Thus if a solution contains 20 ppm of magnesium then the meq would be 1.67 (20/24 gives moles of solute, multiply by 2 for valence= 1.67). In many cases where the valence is one, the Meq equals a molarity based concentration. Does this answer your question?

To get to your difference between your's and the manufacturer's value, since this is an experimentally derived number, how many times did you do the experiment? Perhaps there is a considerable variation and with a larger number of replicates you would approach the reported number.

If this hasn't helped perhaps the Chemistry board would provide better results.
 
I agree, this would probably get a better answer on the Chemistry board. Hopefully one of the mentors will kindly oblige us and move the thread. :smile:
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top