A question about how to start ab initio simulations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ftft
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simulations
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the methodology for conducting ab initio simulations of a compound composed of three molecules: A, B, and C. Participants debate whether to use known equilibrium geometries directly or to first optimize the geometries of each molecule independently before simulating the compound. The consensus leans towards optimizing the geometries based on experimental data, followed by verification through different computational methods to ensure accuracy in the results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ab initio simulation techniques
  • Familiarity with molecular geometry optimization
  • Knowledge of computational chemistry software
  • Experience with experimental data validation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research optimization methods in computational chemistry
  • Learn about different basis sets and functionals in ab initio calculations
  • Explore tools for simulating STM images
  • Investigate the impact of experimental methods on molecular geometry accuracy
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in computational chemistry, molecular modelers, and anyone involved in simulating molecular structures and validating them against experimental data.

ftft
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I want to simulate STM images of some compound composed of 3 molecules A, B and C..
Which is the right way to do the simulations?
*Use the known equilibrium geometries of A, B and C as input for simulating the compound? or
*First optimize the geometries of A, B and C independently and then use their optimized geometries in simulating the compound
I have tried both ways and there were tiny differences in the resulting compound structures.. Still, I need to check for academic accuracy..

Thanks in advance
 
What do you mean "known" equilibrium geometries? Were those found by other peoples' simulations? Was it through experiment? What is the chance the experimental geometries are a little off due to the experimental method used?
When doing the ab initio optimizations of A, B, and C, did different methods, basis sets, functionals produce different results?

Those are some questions to think about. As for me, I generally take the experimentally confirmed equilibrium geometry, optimize it with my program, and if I get worryingly different results, I try a different method for the optimization.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
22K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
539
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
529
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
10K