A question about hypothesis testing

Artusartos
Messages
236
Reaction score
0
The significance level of a test is the probability that the null hypothesis is rejected when it is true, right? And the critical region is the region that we reject the null hypothesis...so can the significance level be calculated by finding the probability of being in the critical region?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the critical region is the region that we reject the null hypothesis
The critical region of a hypothesis test is the set of all outcomes which cause the null hypothesis to be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_hypothesis_testing
The significance level of a test is the probability that the null hypothesis is rejected when it is true, right?
The significance level is usually denoted by the Greek symbol α (lowercase alpha). Popular levels of significance are 10% (0.1), 5% (0.05), 1% (0.01), 0.5% (0.005), and 0.1% (0.001). If a test of significance gives a p-value lower than the significance level α, the null hypothesis is rejected. Such results are informally referred to as 'statistically significant'. For example, if someone argues that "there's only one chance in a thousand this could have happened by coincidence", a 0.001 level of statistical significance is being implied. The lower the significance level chosen, the stronger the evidence required. The choice of significance level is somewhat arbitrary, but for many applications, a level of 5% is chosen by convention.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significance_level
can the significance level be calculated by finding the probability of being in the critical region?
Wouldn't you normally do it the other way around?
How would you choose the critical region?
 
Simon Bridge said:
The critical region of a hypothesis test is the set of all outcomes which cause the null hypothesis to be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_hypothesis_testing The significance level is usually denoted by the Greek symbol α (lowercase alpha). Popular levels of significance are 10% (0.1), 5% (0.05), 1% (0.01), 0.5% (0.005), and 0.1% (0.001). If a test of significance gives a p-value lower than the significance level α, the null hypothesis is rejected. Such results are informally referred to as 'statistically significant'. For example, if someone argues that "there's only one chance in a thousand this could have happened by coincidence", a 0.001 level of statistical significance is being implied. The lower the significance level chosen, the stronger the evidence required. The choice of significance level is somewhat arbitrary, but for many applications, a level of 5% is chosen by convention.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significance_levelWouldn't you normally do it the other way around?
How would you choose the critical region?

No they gave me the critical region and I have to find the significance level...so I just calculate it from the critical region, right?
 
Yeah - without seeing the problem in question, I would just reverse the usual procedure.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top