A question in finding invertion

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
i am given an operator
S:R3[x]->R3[x]

and we have the polinomial from which we take the eigenvalues from
t^3 - 4t
find wether S invertable or not?i tried to think about that and i got that the aigenvalues are 2 , 0, -2
but that only prooves that it diagonizable

i know a law that if the determinant differs zero then its invertable
but i don't know how to apply it here
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it has a zero eigenvalue then it has a nontrivial kernel. It's not invertible.
 
transgalactic said:
i know a law that if the determinant differs zero then its invertable
Hopefully, you know that works both ways because it is the other way you need here: If the determinant of a matrix is 0, then it is not invertible.

When you diagonalize a matrix, its determinant stays the same. The determinant of a diagonal matrix is the product of the numbers on its diagonal. Since the eigenvalues are 2, 0, and -2, the "diagonalized" matrix would have those numbers on its diagonal and so its determinant is 0.

Of course, Dick's method works just as well.
 
ahhh because its determinant is the multiplication of the diagonal
and we got a zero in there
then the whole thing is zero

thanks
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top