A question posed in my calculus class

  • Thread starter Thread starter zidion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Class
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of gravity and the myth surrounding dropping a penny from the Empire State Building. It is clarified that the gravitational pull of the building is negligible compared to that of the Earth, meaning a penny would not be drawn towards it. The conversation also touches on the practical challenges of throwing an object from the building's top without it hitting the structure below. Additionally, the material of the object, whether a penny or a metal ball, does not significantly affect its trajectory due to gravity. Overall, the gravitational influence of buildings on falling objects is minimal and does not alter their path.
zidion
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
During my calculus class yesterday we were learning about the simpler way of determining derivatives, but before that we were discussing arcs and parabolas and the such and eventually about if you fired a bullet up from the ground to the top of the empire state building and it had the correct velocity you could catch it easily. And so the topic shifted about the old penny myth about dropping it from the empire state building. My physics teacher says that the penny would not touch the ground because of the gravitational pull of the empire state building would draw it into the side of the building. So this is the question i pose to you all, If one was to drop a penny would it be drawn to the empire state building. Conversely would it be true also with a ball of copper or some metal?
thanks you for your time.:biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh surely your teacher is putting you on. The gravitational pull of the empire state building, or any building is so small compared to the Earth's that you wouldn't see any change in the trajectory of a penny. Now the empire state building is "stepped back" at the top. I'm not at all sure you could throw a penny from a window at the top so that it would clear the building lower down, but that has nothing to do with the gravitational pull of the building.

Oh, and we are talking about gravity, not magnetic force. What the object is made of is irrelevant, except that very dense objects will overcome air resistance better than light ones.
 
Interesting idea about catching the bullet though.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top