A question related to radioactivity.

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarkStalker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radioactivity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time required for a cobalt-60 source, with a half-life of 5.27 years and an initial activity of 3.50 × 10^5 Bq, to reach a maximum possible error of 10% in its activity. The user expresses confusion about the relationship between uncertainty in calibration and radioactive decay. They provide a solution involving decay calculations but seek clarification on the question's requirements and the connection between the variables. The calculations suggest that the source must decay by 8% to achieve the desired accuracy, leading to a time estimate of approximately 230 days. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of understanding radioactivity and decay in relation to calibration uncertainty.
DarkStalker
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
1. A cobalt-60 source having a half-life of 5.27 years is calibrated and found to have an
activity of 3.50 × 105 Bq. The uncertainty in the calibration is ±2%.
Calculate the length of time, in days, after the calibration has been made, for the stated
activity of 3.50 × 105 Bq to have a maximum possible error of 10%.

A= -лN, where A= Activity, л=Decay Constant and N=Original number of nuclides.

n=Ne^(-лt), where n=number of undecayed nuclides, N= original number of nuclides, л=decay constant and t=time.

3. The Attempt at a Solution : None

I am utterly stumped at this one. Truthfully I didn't even understand the question properly. I can't make a connection between this uncertainty and decay. I have the solution but that didn't help me much. Here it is:

source must decay by 8%
A = A0 exp(–ln2 t / T½) or A/ A0 = 1 / (2t/T)
0.92 = exp(–ln2 × t / 5.27) or 0.92 = 1 / (2t/5.27)
t = 0.634 years
= 230 days
(allow 2 marks for A/ A0 = 0.08, answer 7010 days
allow 1 mark for A/ A0 = 0.12, answer 5880 days)


Could someone please explain to me what exactly the question asks for, and how the quantities are related? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CIE a level physics paper 4. the question was made to be unanswered i guess.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top