A question related to radioactivity.

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarkStalker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radioactivity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time required for a cobalt-60 source, with a half-life of 5.27 years and an initial activity of 3.50 × 10^5 Bq, to reach a maximum possible error of 10% in its activity. The user expresses confusion about the relationship between uncertainty in calibration and radioactive decay. They provide a solution involving decay calculations but seek clarification on the question's requirements and the connection between the variables. The calculations suggest that the source must decay by 8% to achieve the desired accuracy, leading to a time estimate of approximately 230 days. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of understanding radioactivity and decay in relation to calibration uncertainty.
DarkStalker
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
1. A cobalt-60 source having a half-life of 5.27 years is calibrated and found to have an
activity of 3.50 × 105 Bq. The uncertainty in the calibration is ±2%.
Calculate the length of time, in days, after the calibration has been made, for the stated
activity of 3.50 × 105 Bq to have a maximum possible error of 10%.

A= -лN, where A= Activity, л=Decay Constant and N=Original number of nuclides.

n=Ne^(-лt), where n=number of undecayed nuclides, N= original number of nuclides, л=decay constant and t=time.

3. The Attempt at a Solution : None

I am utterly stumped at this one. Truthfully I didn't even understand the question properly. I can't make a connection between this uncertainty and decay. I have the solution but that didn't help me much. Here it is:

source must decay by 8%
A = A0 exp(–ln2 t / T½) or A/ A0 = 1 / (2t/T)
0.92 = exp(–ln2 × t / 5.27) or 0.92 = 1 / (2t/5.27)
t = 0.634 years
= 230 days
(allow 2 marks for A/ A0 = 0.08, answer 7010 days
allow 1 mark for A/ A0 = 0.12, answer 5880 days)


Could someone please explain to me what exactly the question asks for, and how the quantities are related? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CIE a level physics paper 4. the question was made to be unanswered i guess.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top