A rubber ball is plugging a whole in bottom of tank. When will it fail

  • Thread starter Thread starter DylanW
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Rubber Tank
AI Thread Summary
A rubber ball with a 3 cm radius and weighing 5 g is used to plug a 4 cm hole in a tank, and the discussion revolves around calculating when it will fail due to buoyancy. The upward buoyant force on the ball is determined by the water displaced, while the downward force is influenced by the water pressure acting on the hole and the ball's weight. The calculations show that the plug will fail when the water level reaches approximately 8.5 cm. The forum participants emphasize the importance of understanding the forces acting on the ball, particularly the difference in pressure due to atmospheric conditions. Overall, the discussion highlights the need for careful calculations to determine the failure point of the plug.
DylanW
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 3 cm radius rubber ball weighing 5 g is used to plug a 4cm hole in the base of a tank. The tank is in use and is gradually emptying. At approximately what depth will the plug fail by floating up and out of the hole?


Homework Equations


Density



The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so I don't have a numbers and all attempt at a solution :(
But I do have a logical thought process as to how the solution should be solved, but I'm stumped on finding the volume of a partial sphere when given radius and the radius of the base circle - I know it is enough information I just cannot work out how to calculate it.

The way I see it the upward force acting on the sphere will be proportional to the mass of the water displaced, whilst the downward force acting on the sphere will be proportional to the whole sphere so theoretically the plug should fail when the water level is at the height corresponding to the radius of the base circle on the opposite side. I am not sure about this though, as according to the figures given the density of the sphere is only 44 kg/m3 so all my common sense is telling me the plug wouldn't even work :confused:

Am I taking the right approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DylanW said:

Homework Statement


A 3 cm radius rubber ball weighing 5 g is used to plug a 4cm hole in the base of a tank. The tank is in use and is gradually emptying. At approximately what depth will the plug fail by floating up and out of the hole?

Homework Equations


Density

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so I don't have a numbers and all attempt at a solution :(
But I do have a logical thought process as to how the solution should be solved, but I'm stumped on finding the volume of a partial sphere when given radius and the radius of the base circle - I know it is enough information I just cannot work out how to calculate it.

The way I see it the upward force acting on the sphere will be proportional to the mass of the water displaced, whilst the downward force acting on the sphere will be proportional to the whole sphere so theoretically the plug should fail when the water level is at the height corresponding to the radius of the base circle on the opposite side. I am not sure about this though, as according to the figures given the density of the sphere is only 44 kg/m3 so all my common sense is telling me the plug wouldn't even work :confused:

Am I taking the right approach?
If the ball was just submerged, you would be right because the water at any depth would provide almost equal pressure all around (slightly more on the bottom than top - the difference being the buoyant force/cross-secitonal area of the ball), so there would always be a net buoyant force. But here the ball is not subject to water pressure all around because there is only atmospheric pressure on the part that is covering the hole. You have to find the downward water force on the ball (the downward water pressure over the 4 cm diameter hole x area) as a function of depth and then compare that to the upward buoyant force.

AM
 
Thanks very much for the information AM :) I really appreciate it.
I'm just about to go to sleep after I watch the West Ham game, but I'll be working on this first thing tomorrow so I will report back my calculations - I am stoked that I don't need to do that partial sphere calculation as my head may have exploded, and how would I ever complete my assignment then!

But seriously thanks, a nudge in the right direction makes the world of difference.

DylanW
 
Okay so for this one I've done F(UP)=1000.9.8.0.000113 = 1.1N
F(DOWN)=pghA + mg = 1000.9.8.h.(0.02^2).Pi+0.005.9.8 = 12.315h + 0.049 N
When F(Down)=F(Up) plug will fail
h = (1.1-0.049)/12.315 = 8.5 cm.

Feedback please?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top