A simple thermodynamic question

  • Thread starter Thread starter arkofnoah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamic
AI Thread Summary
Shaking a sealed Thermos bottle of hot coffee increases the internal energy due to work done on the system, despite initial confusion about whether this energy contributes to mechanical energy instead. The kinetic energy of the coffee particles increases as they move faster, which can lead to a rise in temperature. However, internal energy specifically refers to random kinetic and potential energy, excluding the overall mechanical energy of the system. After shaking, friction converts the mechanical energy into thermal energy, ultimately affecting the internal energy. Therefore, both internal energy and temperature can increase as a result of shaking the Thermos.
arkofnoah
Messages
124
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


When a sealed Thermos bottle of hot coffee is shaken, what changes, if any, takes place in the temperature of the coffee and its internal energy? Justify your answer.


Homework Equations


Internal energy = random kinetic energy + random potential energy


The Attempt at a Solution


The answer given says that because work is done on the system there is an increase in internal energy. But isn't the work done used to increase the mechanical energy of the system, not the internal energy. There should be no increase in the temperature, shouldn't it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arkofnoah said:

Homework Statement


When a sealed Thermos bottle of hot coffee is shaken, what changes, if any, takes place in the temperature of the coffee and its internal energy? Justify your answer.


Homework Equations


Internal energy = random kinetic energy + random potential energy


The Attempt at a Solution


The answer given says that because work is done on the system there is an increase in internal energy. But isn't the work done used to increase the mechanical energy of the system, not the internal energy. There should be no increase in the temperature, shouldn't it?

Logically I would think that by shaking the bottle the particles kinetic energy increases (they move faster due to the shaking) thus increasing temperature?
 
but if i remember correctly the internal energy of a system excludes the energies due to the state of the body as a whole such as the (translational) kinetic energy due to the motion of the body and the (gravitational) potential energy due to the height of the body. Internal energy includes only 'random' energy, doesn't it?
 
Last edited:
arkofnoah said:
But isn't the work done used to increase the mechanical energy of the system, not the internal energy. There should be no increase in the temperature, shouldn't it?

After the thermos and the coffee inside have stopped moving, the mechanical energy is the same as what it was originally. Friction has converted the additional mechanical energy into thermal energy (internal energy).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
883
Back
Top