How Can Maxima Help Solve 2+1 BTZ Black Hole Metric Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Canopus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of calculating the 2+1 BTZ black hole metric using Maxima, specifically regarding tensor elements like Christoffel symbols, Ricci tensors, and the Einstein tensor. Participants share their experiences with similar calculations, noting the importance of methodology in deriving metric solutions from Einstein's equations. One user offers assistance based on their prior work, highlighting that while they calculated values for a zero cosmological constant, the approach could still be applicable for nonzero cases. The conversation emphasizes the potential difficulties posed by large tensors in calculations and the utility of computer programs for simplifying these tasks. Overall, the thread serves as a collaborative effort to address technical questions related to black hole metric calculations.
Canopus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello mates!

this one is my starting post.

anyone here who is working or did work on 2+1 BTZ black hole, on its metric solution?
have you used Maxima to do maths solutions of tensor elements?
I am in need of some help with calculation.


Regards.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Thanks PAllen. :)
I am doing its calculation, (Christoffel symbols, Ricci Tensors n Scalar, Einstein TensorS) and then have to show the methodology of getting the metric solution from Einstein equation. here I m facing some prob, if there anyone who already went through its calculation by hand or by Maxima, can answer me some question, like,,,, what should we do when a big size tensors make the calculation uneasy!
here is my query :)
 
Just came across your post. If you are still interested, probably I may be of some assistance: just recently I've dealt with a problem of https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=442930". I've calculated those values you look for: Christoffel symbols, Ricci tensors, etc, first by hand and then checking them in Maple.
And here is https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2960035&postcount=4" related to the problem.

But all that is for zero cosmological constant; your case may be different. However, no substantial difficulties should arise if we assume \Lambda to be nonzero.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanking you Zinger0.
I missed it during that time! But still it will help me. Catch you later again! :)
 
I've worked on this problem quite a while ago, but I can try to dig up the calculations. So, what values are you interested in - just those you've mentioned in your previous post? And could you specify the problem you've encountered; since many computer programs can calculate those values if you just define the metric.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top