Absolute Magnitudes for Cepheids

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating absolute magnitudes for Cepheid variables using the equation Mv = - [2.76 log10(P) – 1.0)] – 4.16. A user is struggling to input the calculation correctly into their scientific calculator, leading to inconsistent results. They provide a specific value for P (50.0) and mention an initial result of -9.34, suspecting they may have omitted the negative sign. Other participants ask for clarification on the value of P and the user's intermediate calculations to identify potential errors. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate input and understanding the equation's components for correct results.
sailof
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Would somebody help me in entering a calculation into my scientific calculator?
The equation is Mv = - [2.76 log10(P) – 1.0)] – 4.16
I have the value of P but I'm not sure how to enter this into the calculator. I get a different answer every time.
Thanks,
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Can you tell us what P is, and some of the answers you are getting? Maybe we can spot what you're doing wrong. What did you get for the 2.76logP part?
 
I'm solving for absolute magnitudes for Cepheids. For my first Cepheid P is 50.0 and my first response was -9.34 but I think I forgot to enter the negative sign at the beginning of the equation.
thank you.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top