Absorption Spectra: Determine Dilute/Thick Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter benndamann33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absorption Spectra
AI Thread Summary
To determine if a solution is optically dilute or thick, the absorption coefficient (a) is key, as it indicates how much light is absorbed per centimeter. A lower absorption coefficient suggests an optically dilute solution, while a higher coefficient indicates an optically thick solution. The relationship between transmitted intensity (I) and incident intensity (Io) can be expressed using the equation I = Io e^(-ax), allowing for calculations of a based on light transmission percentages. For example, when 75% of light is transmitted, a equals 0.28, while at 50% and 25% transmission, a equals 0.69 and 1.39, respectively. Understanding these values can help assess the optical properties of various solutions.
benndamann33
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
If you're reading a graph of absorption coefficient(cm^-1) versus wavelength(nm), how can you dtermine if the solution is optically dilute? What about optically thick? Thanks
Ben
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well as the absorbtion coefficient is per cm, i am guessing the higher it is the more light is being absorbed when traveling through a cm of the substance. So the optically diluter substance is probably the one with the lower coefficient.
 
I agree, unfortunately I'm not comparing two spectra, but rather just answering for a variety of spectra is the solution optically dilute? Is it Optically thick? And not sure where the cut off is, can't find a value anywhere
 
K i looked on wikipedia and the equation for absorbtion coefficient is:

I = Io e^-ax

Where I is transmitted intensity, Io is incident intensity, a is the attenuation coefficient and x is the thickness of the substance. Rearranging for a:

a = ln(Io/I)

If we try some values:

When 75% of light is transmitted a = 0.28

When 50% of light is transmitted a = 0.69

When 25% of light is transmitted a = 1.39

Maybe that will help you
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top