AC Circuits question verification

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a YouTube tutorial about AC circuits, specifically addressing a potential error in the calculation of impedance (Z). The equation presented in the video, Z=√(R^2+(Xc-XL)^2), is questioned, with the correct form being Z=√(R^2+(XL-XC)^2) to reflect the difference between inductive reactance (XL) and capacitive reactance (XC). It is clarified that while the squared difference yields the same result, the convention typically considers XL as positive and XC as negative. The presenter likely made a simple error in her working. The importance of verifying equations and calculations in educational content is emphasized.
Yarnzorrr
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

in this youtube tutorial about AC circuits

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiLdrAHBBRc&feature=plcp

at about 4:08 It's supposed to be z=√(R^2+(XL-Xc)^2)) but in the example she does Xc-XL, is there a reason for this or is it a mistake in her working??
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Xl - Xc is correct. In her example she has (Xc - Xl)^2. When she squares the difference, the result is the same.
 
The equation should be written
Z = √(R^2 +(XL ~XC)^2)
because it is the difference between XL and XC that is important. It does not matter which is greater.
 
In this equation that's true but generally Xl is regarded as positive and Xc as negative.
 


Hello there,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. After reviewing the video, I can confirm that the equation used is correct. The mistake in the working is most likely a simple error made by the presenter. It is important to always double-check equations and calculations in order to avoid these types of mistakes. Thank you for verifying the information and bringing it to my attention.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Back
Top