Acceleration assumed in the wrong direction again

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the common issue of incorrectly assuming the direction of acceleration in physics problems. The participant recognizes that their choice of positive direction affects the signs of acceleration and distance, leading to contradictions in their equations. They emphasize that the sign of the distances should reflect whether they are increasing or decreasing, rather than strictly adhering to a predefined axis. Consistency in the sign convention is crucial for accurate problem-solving. Understanding this principle can help avoid similar mistakes in future exams.
cipotilla
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Acceleration assumed in the wrong direction again!

Homework Statement


See page 1, this is the problem statement, figure and the solution as supplied in the books manual.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I solved this problem as seen on page 2, clearly, I assumed the acceleration in the wrong direction. But why is this a problem? Friction is not a factor here and I think the directions for the accelerations that I assumed are reasonable.

How can I avoid making this kind of mistake on an exam?? I always seem to pick the wrong direction for the acceleration.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Once you set up your constraint equation, everything that follows must be consistent with it. Realize that the signs of Aa, Ab, and Ac are positive when Xa, Xb, and Xc are increasing. Your force equations for A & C contradict that assumption.
 
So when you are setting up the constraint equation, what determines the sign of your X's are not the axes you establish but wether or not the distance X is increasing or decreasing. For example, in this problem, I established my x-direction as positive to the left, but this has nothing to do with Xc being positive or negative. When I assumed the distance Xc positive, I also assumed that the the Xc distance was increasing and that block c was moving to the right (which contradicts my sign convention, left being positive). Am I making sense? This is why I think I keep getting confused.
 
cipotilla said:
So when you are setting up the constraint equation, what determines the sign of your X's are not the axes you establish but wether or not the distance X is increasing or decreasing.
Yes. Remember that the constraint is just a way of saying that the cord length doesn't change.
For example, in this problem, I established my x-direction as positive to the left, but this has nothing to do with Xc being positive or negative.
Correct.
When I assumed the distance Xc positive, I also assumed that the the Xc distance was increasing and that block c was moving to the right (which contradicts my sign convention, left being positive).
Xc is defined (see the diagram) as the horizontal distance between C and the first pulley. Ac will be positive if Xc increases, which means that it accelerates to the right. Your sign convention doesn't matter, as long as you are consistent.

Want to take "to the left" as positive? No problem. The force will then be +T and the acceleration will be -Ac.

Want "to the right" to be positive? Again, no problem. The force is now -T and the acceleration is +Ac.

Once you solve for Ac, you will find the actual acceleration.
Am I making sense?
I think you're getting the idea.
 
Thanks you,.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top