Acceleration due to gravity of rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the gravitational potential and acceleration due to gravity of a thin rod modeled with the mass of the Earth and the length equal to the Earth's radius. The gravitational potential was initially miscalculated, with a value of -6.91657*10^7 Joules being incorrectly equated to mgh. Participants clarified that gravitational potential is a property of the field and should not involve mass in its calculation. After evaluating the integral and differentiating the potential with respect to distance, the correct acceleration due to gravity at 0.86 times the rod's length was found to be approximately 11.45 m/s². The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying gravitational concepts and equations in physics problems.
oddjobmj
Messages
305
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a thin rod of mass M and length L. Determine the gravitational potential at a point which is a distance r from the center of the rod and which lies on the midplane of the rod.

Now suppose M is equal to the mass of the Earth and L is equal to the radius of the Earth.

Determine the acceleration due to gravity (of the rod) at a distance r = 0.86 L from the center of the rod.


Homework Equations



\Phi(r)=\intL/2-L/2\frac{-G(M/L)}{sqrt(z^2+r^2)}dz

U=mgh

The Attempt at a Solution



I calculate the gravitational potential to be -6.91657*10^7 Joules.

mgh=-6.91657*10^7 Joules

g=\frac{-6.91657*10^7}{m*h}

The distance from the rod is r=.86*L but what is m? If I ignore m I get -12.62 m/s^2 which is incorrect.

Suggestions? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oddjobmj said:

Homework Statement


Consider a thin rod of mass M and length L. Determine the gravitational potential at a point which is a distance r from the center of the rod and which lies on the midplane of the rod.

Now suppose M is equal to the mass of the Earth and L is equal to the radius of the Earth.

Determine the acceleration due to gravity (of the rod) at a distance r = 0.86 L from the center of the rod.


Homework Equations



\Phi(r)=\intL/2-L/2\frac{-G(M/L)}{sqrt(z^2+r^2)}dz

Correct so far... What did you get for the integral?

oddjobmj said:
U=mgh

mgh is the gravitational potential energy of a mass m at height h above the Earth surface. It is irrelevant here.

The [STRIKE]potential[/STRIKE] force in the gravitational field of the rod is the force acting on unit mass. It depends on the mass of the rod and contains the gravitational constant G.

oddjobmj said:
I calculate the gravitational potential to be -6.91657*10^7 Joules.

mgh=-6.91657*10^7 Joules

g=\frac{-6.91657*10^7}{m*h}

The distance from the rod is r=.86*L but what is m? If I ignore m I get -12.62 m/s^2 which is incorrect.

Suggestions? Thank you!

That is all wrong. Determine the integral, and substitute r=0.86 L, M= M(Earth) and L= R(Earth)

Edit:
The [STRIKE]potential [/STRIKE] negative gradient of the potential is the magnitude of the gravitational force on unit mass, and the gravitational force exerted on mass m is F=-gradΦ m, and F=ma . The magnitude of the gravitational acceleration is equal to the gradient of the potential at the given point.

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
ehild said:
The potential in the gravitational field of the rod is the force acting on unit mass.
No, that's the field, the grad of the potential.
oddjobmj said:
I calculate the gravitational potential to be -6.91657*10^7 Joules.
Gravitational potential has dimension L2T-2. So J/kg here.
mgh=-6.91657*10^7 Joules
No, you cannot equate the potential to mgh. First, you don't want the m at all. The potential is a property of the field, independently of any mass placed in it. Ditching the m at least makes the dimensions right. But neither is it equal to gh. That would be the potential difference when moving with or against a uniform field for a distance h. The potential is zero at infinity and negative everywhere else.
For the acceleration you need to differentiate the potential wrt r.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
haruspex said:
No, that's the field, the grad of the potential.
Huh, I made a big mistake. Thank you, haruspex that you warned me.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ah, not sure what I was thinking. It was a long night. Thank you!

Evaluating the integral I get:

\frac{-2GMsinh^{-1}(L/2r)}{L}

Taking the derivative of that with respect to r I get:

\frac{2GMr}{(r^2)^{3/2}sqrt{L^2/r^2+4}}

Plugging in my known values I get 11.45 m/s2

Thank you both for all your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top