Acceleration of 3 Blocks w/ Pulley

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of three connected blocks using Newton's second law. The original poster attempts to simplify the problem by canceling out tension forces but is advised to draw free-body diagrams for each mass instead. This method would clarify the forces acting on each block and help set up simultaneous equations for a more accurate solution. The importance of considering the string length for a time-dependent solution is also highlighted. Ultimately, a structured approach is recommended for resolving the problem effectively.
Coop
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There's a picture with the problem attached

A block with mass m = 1.5 kg hangs to the right of two blocks with masses m2 = 2.2 kg and m1 = 1.2 kg which sit on a table. All three blocks are connected with a string and pulley. Neglecting the mass of the pulley, string and any friction, find the acceleration.

Homework Equations



F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer key says that m*g = (m + m1 + m2)*a

Is my reasoning below correct in coming to that conclusion? I was at first confused at why the tension forces are not shown.

I ignore the weight and normal force of the boxes on the table, since they cancel

\sum F_{x} = (T_{m_{2}})_{x} + (T_{m_{1}})_{left} + (T_{m_{1}})_{right}

But (T_{m_{2}})_{x} + (T_{m_{1}})_{left} cancel, right? Because they are equal but opposite?

So, \sum F_{x} = (T_{m_{1}})_{right}

And,

\sum F_{y} = (T_{m})_{y} + w_{y}

So,

F_{net} = \sum F_{x} + \sum F_{y} = (T_{m_{1}})_{right} + (T_{m})_{y} + w_{y}

But since,

(T_{m_{1}})_{right} + (T_{m})_{y} are equal but opposite, they too cancel, right?

So you are left with F_{net} = m_{net}*a = w_{y} = m*g

Then, you can solve

F_{net} = 4.9 kg*a = 1.5 kg*9.81\frac{m}{s^2}

a = 3.00 \frac{m}{s^2}

Does my reasoning make sense of how the tensions cancel and so are not factored into the equation?

Thanks,
Coop
 

Attachments

  • Practice MT1 #9.png
    Practice MT1 #9.png
    8.4 KB · Views: 626
Physics news on Phys.org
I cannot tell how you've done it because I don't know your labelling.
However, you appear to be trying to do the problem all in one go. This is not the "correct" approach.
You should be drawing a free-body diagram for each mass, apply ƩF=ma to each one (using appropriate choice of + or - signs to show direction), and then solve the system of simultaneous equations. If you do that, questions about what cancels what will resolve themselves.

If you know how long the string between masses is, you will have a time-dependent solution - otherwise you should state "as long as m1 and m2 remain on the table" or something like that.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
852
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
19K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top