Acceleration of a compound pendulum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the downward acceleration of the center of mass of a uniform thin rod after one support is removed. The initial calculations yield an angular acceleration of 3/2 * g/L and a downward acceleration of 3/4 * g. However, confusion arises regarding the force exerted by the remaining support, which is initially miscalculated. Clarifications emphasize that the resultant force is the sum of gravitational force and the support force, leading to the correct support force being M * g / 4. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding torque and the center of mass in rigid body dynamics.
ModusPwnd
Messages
1,255
Reaction score
119

Homework Statement


A uniform thin rod of mass M and length L is supported horizontally by two supports, one at each end. The acceleration of gravity, g, is constant and in the downward direction. At time t=0 the left support is removed.

Find the downward acceleration of the center of mass at t=0 in terms of M, L and g. Also, find the angular acceleration and the force exerted by the remaining support.

Homework Equations


\vec{\tau} = \vec{r} \times \vec{F}
|\tau| = I \alpha

The Attempt at a Solution

To calculate the downward acceleration, I first calculate the torque.

\vec{\tau} = \frac{-L}{2}\hat{y} \times (-M g) \hat{z} = \frac{LMg}{2}\hat{x}

Equate this torque with the moment of inertia times the angular acceleration, and solve for angular acceleration.

\alpha = \frac{\tau}{I} = \frac{\frac{L}{2} M g}{\frac{1}{3} M L^2}=\frac{3}{2}\frac{g}{L}

Then, solve for the acceleration,
a = r \alpha = \frac{L}{2} \cdot \frac{3}{2}\frac{g}{L} = \frac{3}{4} g

Find the force by F=ma,

F = m a = M \frac{3}{4} gWhere have I gone wrong here? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your force is wrong. The resultant force is equal to the mass times the acceleration of the CM. The forces are gravity and the force at the support.


ehild
 
Thanks, that makes sense. But I am still a little confused because the acceleration is at the center of mass, the force of gravity is at the center of mass but the support is at a different location. I can sum up the forces even though the support is causing a torque? Perhaps I should sum up the torques! I just now realized, I think that is what I should do.
 
The torque refers to an axis and equals force times the distance of the line of force from the axis. You calculated the torque of gravity with respect to the supported end of the rod. If there are more forces, their torques add up, but what is the torque of the supporting force with respect to the support?

In case of a rigid body, the resultant force is the vectorial sum of all forces acting. The forces can be shifted along their line. Parallel forces add up algebraically. No matter where the forces attack. You have two forces, one is gravity, the other is the supporting force. The acceleration of the CM multiplied by the total mass is equal to the resultant force.
What you should do is to find out is the acceleration of the CM. For that, you need to know its position. The rod is homogeneous. Where is its CM? The rod sweeps a circle with one end as the centre. Every point of it moves along a circular path, with the same angular velocity and angular acceleration. So what is the linear acceleration of the CM?

ehild
 
I found the CM downward acceleration to be
\frac{3}{4} g

If I understand you correctly, its as simple as doing,

ma = M \frac{3}{4}(- g) = - M g + F_{\text{Support}}

Solve for the force and get,
F_{\text{Support}} = \frac{1}{4} gI still can't help but be skeptical though... The point at which the support is applying a force is not accelerating at all. I feel like I can only use forces shifted along a line if there is no rotation in the rigid body. Ill take it as it is for now though. Thanks
 
You forgot the M, Fs=Mg/4.


ModusPwnd said:
I still can't help but be skeptical though... The point at which the support is applying a force is not accelerating at all. I feel like I can only use forces shifted along a line if there is no rotation in the rigid body. Ill take it as it is for now though. Thanks

No matter how the individual points move. The centre of mass accelerates as if the sum of all the external forces attacked at it and its acceleration is equal to the vector sum of all external forces divided by the total mass.

If two parallel/antiparallel forces act on a rigid body the resultant is a force equal to the algebraic sum of the forces (and its point of attack is that point for which the the torque of the two forces is equal and opposite).

You can understand this by looking at the picture. It is a rigid rod and two forces act on it at different points, F1 and F2, parallel and of opposite direction, like in the problem Fs an -mg.
You can add two equal and opposite horizontal forces (the green ones): They would cancel, so do not influence the system of forces. Add the horizontal forces to the vertical ones: You get two forces (red) which are not parallel any more, they can be shifted to a common point where the resultant can be drawn. This resultant force can be shifted againso its point of attack is on the rod.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • antipar.JPG
    antipar.JPG
    8.8 KB · Views: 583
That picture does help, thanks.
 
Back
Top