Acceleration of a conducting bar on rails in a magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a conducting bar sliding on rails in a magnetic field. The relevant equations include the magnetic force on the bar and the application of Newton's second law. There is confusion regarding the angle θ in the equations, with participants debating its value and significance in relation to the magnetic field's orientation. The consensus is that while the angle can vary based on the magnetic field's direction, it ultimately does not affect the final acceleration calculation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying Faraday's law of induction to account for the magnetic field's influence.
nickmanc86
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. In the arrangement shown, a conducting bar of negligible resistance slides along
horizontal, parallel, frictionless conducting rails connected as shown to a 4.0-Ω resistor.
A uniform 2.5-T magnetic field makes an angle of 30° with the plane of the paper. If
L = 80 cm and the mass of the bar is 0.40 kg, what is the magnitude of the acceleration of
the bar at an instant when its speed is 1.5 m/s?


http://labman.phys.utk.edu/phys222/modules/m5/images/bar4.gif



2.F_{b} =I \ast L \ast B \ast sin(\theta) and F_{app} =m \ast a



3. I set the two equations equal to one another and then proceed to solve for a. In this new equation I substitute in I= \frac{V}{R} and V=B \ast L\ast v(i)The resulting equation of a= \frac{ B^{2}\ast L^{2} \ast v(i)}{R \ast m} \ast sin(\theta). I come out with an answer of 1.88 however the correct answer is apparently suppose to be 0.9.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
nickmanc86 said:
F_{b} =I \ast L \ast B \ast sin(\theta)

Can you describe the meaning of θ in this equation? What is it's value for this problem?

Can you describe the direction of the force on the bar?
V=B \ast L\ast v(i)

This equation does not account for the angle that the magnetic field makes to the plane of the paper.
 
θ in the first equation would be the angle between the I*L vector and the B vector or the bar and the magnetic field so it should be 30 degrees?

For the second equation that would lead me to believe that because this equation originates from F_{b} = q \vec{v} \times \vec{B} it should come out to be F=qvBsin(θ) and that finally plugging into the last equation it should actually be sin^{2}(\theta) ?

I will try this and see what it comes out to.
 
nickmanc86 said:
θ in the first equation would be the angle between the I*L vector and the B vector or the bar and the magnetic field so it should be 30 degrees?

OK. It seems to me that the question statement is ambiguous about the direction of B. Suppose we let the x-axis be oriented left to right, let the y-axis be parallel to the bar, and the z axis out of the page. Then it appears that you are taking the direction of B such that B has a negative z component, a positive y component, and no x component. Then θ would equal 30o as you stated. Another possible orientation would be for B to have a negative z component, a positive or negative x component, and no y component. Then θ would equal 90o. There are an infinite number of other possibilities for the orientation of B where the x and y components are both nonzero and θ will have other values.

But, you can show that all of these orientations lead to the same answer for the acceleration of the bar. So, your choice should be ok.

For the second equation that would lead me to believe that because this equation originates from F_{b} = q \vec{v} \times \vec{B} it should come out to be F=qvBsin(θ) and that finally plugging into the last equation it should actually be sin^{2}(\theta) ?

I'm not sure about your reasoning here, but you are correct that there should be a factor of sinθ in the voltage expression. For me, it's easier to apply Faraday's law of induction: V = rate of change of flux. The flux will incorporate the direction of B with respect to the plane of the loop.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top