Acceleration of a solid cylinder on an incline

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the acceleration of a solid cylinder rolling down an incline, specifically showing that it is given by the equation a = 2/3 g sin(theta). Participants clarify the use of conservation of mechanical energy and the moment of inertia, I = 1/2 MR^2, in the calculations. A key point is the relationship between linear and angular velocity, which is crucial for connecting rolling motion to linear acceleration. The confusion arises from the initial conditions and the misinterpretation of variables in the energy equation. Ultimately, the correct derivation includes recognizing the contributions of both translational and rotational kinetic energy.
chelseaalyssa
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the acceleration of a solid cylinder rolling down an incline that makes an angle (theta) with the horizontal is given by the equation:
a=2/3 g sin(theta)


Homework Equations


Using the conservation of mechanical energy:
1/2 Mv2 + 1/2 I w2 + Mgh = 1/2Mv2 + 1/2 Iw2 + Mgh
***Note: w = angular velocity, I'm just not sure how to insert the symbol
v2 = v20 + 2a(x-x0)
I=1/2MR2

The Attempt at a Solution


After simplifying the conservation of mechanical energy equation and substituting in the equation for moment of inertia, I got:
1/4v2 + gh = 1/2v2 + 1/4v2

In order to solve for acceleration, I substituted in the equation v2=2a(d) ... where d is equal to distance down the incline:
1/4(2ad) + gh = 1/2(2ad) + 1/4(2ad)
Simplified:
gh = ad
Therefore, a = gh/d
And height/distance is equal to sin(theta):
a=gsin(theta)

The problem is that I don't know where the 2/3 comes in ...

Thankyou in advance for your help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chelseaalyssa said:
v2 = v20 + 2a(x-x0)
Hello Chelseaalyssa
Nice problem you have there. I see you found that if you flip the cilinder to the side the acceleration would fully go to sliding. The 2/3 factor is one to prove. Part of the potential energy comes into rolling the cilinder. I have tried to find if the moment of inertia is indeed
I=MR^2/2. Have not found the page(s) in my mechanic book where this very nice way of using integrals is directed to the most common forms... Suppose that this is correct:
The most important thing is to connect the rolling to the moving; so the omega w and the velocity v.
Succes and greetings from Janm
 
In this equation, 1/4v2 + gh = 1/2v2 + 1/4v2, the v on the left side is not the same as the v on the right side.

If v on the left is initially zero, i.e. the cylinder is at rest, then the equation becomes

gh = 1/2v2 + 1/4v2

and then using v2=2a(d)

gh = 1/2(2ad) + 1/4(2ad).
 
Oh ok - I see where I went wrong...
Thanks for the help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top