Acceleration of a tank leaking water

  • Thread starter Thread starter guv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tank Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the acceleration of a tank leaking water, with participants debating the validity of two proposed solutions. The first solution is favored for its correctness, while the second suggests that the tank accelerates despite the water leak. A key point raised is that the second solution misapplies the momentum equation, assuming that leaked water does not carry away momentum. This misinterpretation leads to incorrect conclusions about the system's dynamics. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying physical principles to analyze the problem.
guv
Messages
122
Reaction score
22
Homework Statement
A tank stores water on the inside. Initially the total mass of the
tank and water is ##M##. A constant horizontal force ##F## to the right is applied on the
tank while water starts leaking out at constant rate ##r## (measured
in kilograms/second). Assume the leaked water is momentarily at
rest with respect to the tank and it's leaked from the left side
of the tank.

Determine the acceleration of the tank as a function of time. Ignore all forms of friction and assume the tank moves on a horizontal surface.
Relevant Equations
$$a = \frac{F}{M - rt}$$
$$\vec F = \frac{d (m \vec v)}{dt} = \frac{d m}{dt} \vec v + m \frac{d \vec v}{dt} = - r \vec v + (M - rt) \vec a $$
I would think the first solution is correct but the provided solution to this problem suggests the 2nd solution. Let me know what you guys think about this. Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
guv said:
Let me know what you guys think about this.
I think that you might profit by reading this insight article that was written specifically to guide one's thinking about problems of this kind.
 
guv said:
I would think the first solution is correct
Quite so.
This can easily be seen by setting ##F=0, v_0>0##. According to the second solution, the tank accelerates.
The trouble with ##F=\frac{d(mv)}{dt}## is that it only applies to a closed system of masses. The way it has been used in the second equation is as though the leaked water has carried away no momentum with it, imparting all the momentum it had to the tank and the water remaining in it.
 
  • Like
Likes Tomy World and guv
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top