Acceleration of a wire inside a magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
A uniform wire with a linear mass density of 0.520 g/m and a current of 2.70 A is subjected to a magnetic field of 4.17×10^-3 T, leading to a derived acceleration equation a = ILB/m. The user initially calculated the acceleration as 21.65 m/s^2 but neglected to account for Earth's gravitational acceleration, which is approximately 9.81 m/s^2. After correcting for gravity, the effective acceleration was determined to be 11.84 m/s^2. Additionally, there was a discussion regarding the negligible effect of Earth's magnetic field on the overall calculations. The final resolution emphasized the importance of considering all forces acting on the wire.
kopinator
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
A uniform horizontal wire with a linear mass density of 0.520 g/m carries a 2.70 A current. It is placed in a constant magnetic field, with a strength of 4.17×10-3 T, that is horizontal and perpendicular to the wire. As the wire moves upward starting from rest, what is its acceleration? Neglect the magnetic field of the Earth.

F=ma
F=ILB

From these two equations, I derived an equation a= ILB/m. I have all the variables except L and m which will come with each other once I figure how to incorporate the mass density. So my question is, how do I use the linear mass density in this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
m/L is the mass density.
 
ok. So i rearranged the equation to be ma/L=IB. Since the mass density is .520 g/m, I divided IB/.520 and got .02165 m/s^2. But when i plugged it in it was wrong. I converted .520 g/m to .000520 kg/m and solved and still got the wrong answer. What am I doing wrong?
 
I get 21.65 N. What is the "correct" answer?

Lay out all of your numbers and calculate again; also what happened to the kg?
 
I figured it out. 21.65 m/s^2 was the correct value from the equation but I had to take into account that the wire is still being affect by Earth's gravitational acceleration so i took 21.65-9.81 = 11.84 m/s^2. Thank you for ur assistance!
 
I thought it said " Neglect the magnetic field of the Earth", which is averages 0.5 gauss:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_magnetic_field

But if it is to be included we have 1 T = 10,000 gauss, so the it is 0.05 x 10^-3 T, or about 1% of your given field; and of course the force depends upon the direction of the wire ... so assuming that the fields are anti-parallel (opposite polarities) the reduction is only 0.22 N or so.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top